1 option
Sled Test Evaluation of Racecar Head/Neck Restraints Bioengineering Center, Wayne State University
- Format:
- Conference/Event
- Author/Creator:
- Melvin, John, author.
- Conference Name:
- Motorsports Engineering Conference & Exhibition (2002-12-02 : Indianapolis, Indiana, United States)
- Language:
- English
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource
- Place of Publication:
- Warrendale, PA SAE International 2002
- Summary:
- Recent action by some racecar sanctioning bodies making head/neck restraint use mandatory for competitors has resulted in a number of methods attempting to provide head/neck restraint. This paper evaluates the performance of a number of commercially available head/neck restraint systems using a stock car seating configuration and a realistic stock car crash pulse. The tests were conducted at an impact angle of 30 degrees to the right, with a midsize male Hybrid III anthropomorphic test device (ATD) modified for racecar crash testing. A six-point latch and link racing harness restrained the ATD. The goal of the tests was to examine the performance of the head/neck restraint without the influence of the seat or steering wheel.Three head/neck restraint systems were tested using a sled pulse with a 35 mph (56 km/h) velocity change and 50G peak deceleration. Three tests with three samples of each system were performed to assess repeatability. The systems tested were the HANS®, the Hutchens device, and the D-CEL device. Head accelerations, neck loads and moments were analyzed to provide a comparison of the various systems ability to control head dynamics. Kinematic control of the head was also determined from analysis of the high-speed video recordings to obtain forward head excursion.The results of the tests on each device are presented in absolute terms, compared to baseline tests (no head/neck restraint) and normalized to the best performing device
- Notes:
- Vendor supplied data
- Publisher Number:
- 2002-01-3304
- Access Restriction:
- Restricted for use by site license
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.