1 option
Causes of Weight Reduction Effects of Material Substitution on Constant Stiffness Components Mississippi State University
- Format:
- Conference/Event
- Author/Creator:
- Patton, Richard, author.
- Conference Name:
- SAE 2002 World Congress & Exhibition (2002-03-04 : Detroit, Michigan, United States)
- Language:
- English
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource
- Place of Publication:
- Warrendale, PA SAE International 2002
- Summary:
- The substitution of lightweight materials, such as aluminum or magnesium alloys, to produce lightweight car bodies, has been the subject of intensive research in resent years. It has been established that an aluminum body is lighter than a steel body for constant stiffness. The causes of this weight reduction have not been established. In particular, since the specific modulus (modulus of elasticity/density) of steel, aluminum and magnesium are nearly identical, there is no easy answer for their ability to reduce weight.In this paper, it is shown that there are stress concentrations in thin walled structures, which are dependent on the thickness of the material. These stress concentrations appear in joints and other parts with complex geometry and loading conditions. For example, the flanges on a curved beam in flexure have an effective (load bearing) width, which increases as the material is thickened. A part made of thicker material uses its material more efficiently (has a higher percentage of load-bear material) than a thinner part. This thickness dependence is important because thin-walled parts made from lightweight materials, such as aluminum, are thicker than their steel counterparts; hence the parts made from lightweight materials use their material more efficiently. It is further shown that reducing the stress concentrations through better reinforcements produces significant weight reduction effects and also reduces the weight reduction effects of substituting aluminum for steel. Thus a strong, lightweight body can be achieved using steel and proper design of joints and other complex geometry parts. This is a more cost-effective way of achieving a lightweight body
- Notes:
- Vendor supplied data
- Publisher Number:
- 2002-01-1291
- Access Restriction:
- Restricted for use by site license
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.