My Account Log in

1 option

Modifying an Intake Manifold to Improve Cylinder-to-Cylinder EGR Distribution in a DI Diesel Engine Using Combined CFD and Engine Experiments GM R&D and Planning

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Siewert, Robert M., author.
Conference Name:
SAE International Fall Fuels & Lubricants Meeting & Exhibition (2001-09-24 : San Antonio, Texas, United States)
Spring Fuels & Lubricants Meeting & Exhibition (2002-05-06 : Reno, Nevada, United States)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2001
Summary:
Improved cylinder-to-cylinder distribution of EGR in a 2-L Direct-Injection (DI) Diesel engine has been identified as one enabler to help reach more stringent emission standards. Through a combined effort of modeling, design, and experiment, two manifolds were developed that improve EGR distribution over the original manifold while minimizing design changes to engine components or interfering with the many varied vehicle platform installations.One of the modified manifolds, an elevated EGR entry (EEE) approach, provided a useful improvement over the original design that meet Euro-II emission standards, and has been put into production as it enabled meeting the Euro III emissions requirements a year early. The second revision, the distributed EGR entry (DEE) design, showed potential for further improvement in EGR distribution. This design has two EGR outlets rather than the one used in the original and EEE manifolds, and was first identified by modeling to be a promising concept. Using rapid prototype parts with variable geometry, over 40 variations of the DEE concept were studied experimentally in an attempt to identify an improved configuration. Parallel CFD modeling studies of just a few configurations pointed to a much-improved design, while the experimental methods used to determine EGR distribution sometimes gave quite misleading results. CFD modeling further identified why the experimental results were sometimes conflicting
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2001-01-3685
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account