My Account Log in

1 option

Identifying Less Stressful Work Methods: Computer-aided Simulation vs. Human Subject Study National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Hsiao, Hongwei, author.
Conference Name:
Digital Human Modeling For Design And Engineering Conference And Exposition (2000-06-06 : Dearborn, Michigan, United States)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource cm
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2000
Summary:
Engineering analyses of work methods can help identify approaches to reduce the risk of occupational injuries; computer-aided simulation technology is effective in terms of time and cost for evaluating multiple work methods. This paper analyzed scaffolding, a common activity in construction with high frequency of overexertion injuries, through a computer simulation model (3DSSPP) to identify less stressful work strategies. A laboratory study was also performed to verify the appropriateness of using the model for scaffolding job analyses.Seven commonly used end-frame lifting techniques were evaluated. Computer simulations of these work techniques show that considerable biomechanical stress occurs to most of the workers at their shoulders and elbows. A symmetric front-lifting at knuckle height appears to be the less stressful work technique, as determined by computer simulation. The laboratory study of the seven lifting methods, by measuring whole body isometric strength, confirmed the 3DSSPP simulation results. The simulation model is suitable for identifying less stressful work methods; the net benefit achieved from the use of the model is a reduction in testing cost as compared to traditional prototyping methodologies. The "at risk" estimation of the model seems to be conservative when compared to the laboratory experiment results. This is probably because the isometric strength of construction workers is higher than that of workers in manufacturing, which was used in the 3DSSPP model
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2000-01-2163
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account