My Account Log in

1 option

Predicting Vehicle Engine Performance: Assessment of Machine Learning Techniques and Data Imputation KAUST

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Giraldo Delgado, Juan Camilo, author.
Contributor:
Gorbatenko, Inna
Kuzhagaliyeva, Nursulu
Sarathy, Mani
Conference Name:
WCX SAE World Congress Experience (2024-04-16 : Detroit, Michigan, United States)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource cm
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2024
Summary:
The accurate prediction of engine performance maps can guide data-driven optimization of engine technologies to control fuel use and associated emissions. However, engine operational maps are scarcely reported in literature and often have missing data. Assessment of missing-data resilient algorithms in the context of engine data prediction could enable better processing of real-world driving cycles, where missing data is a more pervasive phenomenon. The goal of this study is, therefore, to determine the most effective technique to deal with missing data and employ it in prediction of engine performance characteristics. We assess the performance of two machine learning approaches, namely Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and the extreme tree boosting algorithm (XGBoost), in handling missing data. Zero imputation and three statistical methods, specifically K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Expectation Maximization (EM) and Multivariate Imputation Chained Equations (MICE), were employed as a pre-processing step with ANN model. The efficiency of each technique was evaluated at various degrees of missing data in the input (25%, 50 and 75%). In addition, the imputation quality of missing data was estimated using Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) and Raw Bias. The ANN model's ability to predict fuel consumption and thermal efficiency was limited by missing data input with the zero-imputation technique. Among statistical methods coupled with ANN, EM exhibited the least satisfying performance while KNN performed the best. XGBoost with sparsity aware algorithm outperformed other methods by demonstrating the best adaptability to input's missing information
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2024-01-2016
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account