My Account Log in

1 option

Dynamic Performance Optimization of Ball Joints with Cross Groove for Automotive Driveshaft System Southwest Jiaotong University

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Zhan, Haojing, author.
Contributor:
Hou, Qiufeng
Shangguan, Wenbin
Wan, Lixiang
Wu, X. (Xiaoyong)
Conference Name:
WCX SAE World Congress Experience (2024-04-16 : Detroit, Michigan, United States)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource cm
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2024
Summary:
The ball joint with cross groove offers both angular and plunging motion. When transmitting the same torque, the cross groove ball joint is lighter than other plunging Constant Velocity Joints (CVJs). It is crucial for the design of the joint and enhancing the contact fatigue life of the raceway to accurately estimate component loads of the ball joints with cross groove. In this study, the transmission efficiency of the joint and the peak value of contact force between ball and the track are used as evaluation indexes for characterizing dynamic performance of the joint. A multibody dynamic model of the joint is established to calculate its dynamic performance. In the model, the contact properties and friction characteristics of the internal structures were modeled, and a nonlinear equivalent spring and damping model was adopted for estimating the contact force. The transmission efficiency loss of the cross groove joint was measured and compared with the calculated values. Taking friction coefficient, pitch radius, ball diameter, pressure angle, raceway inclination angle, and similarity as design variables, the dominate influencing factors on the dynamic performance of the joint were analyzed. A proxy model for estimating transmission efficiency loss and contact force peak of the joint was established based on the established multibody dynamics model of the joint. Using the presented proxy model and the NSGA2 genetic algorithm, and take the five structural parameters of the CVJ as the optimization design variables, and the transmission efficiency and contact force peak of the joint as the optimization objectives, and the optimal solutions of the parameters were obtained
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2024-01-2438
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account