My Account Log in

1 option

Numerical Comparison of TPMS Structures for the Design of an Automotive Engine Oil Cooler Universita degli Studi di Modena

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Torri, Federico, author.
Contributor:
Berni, Fabio
Colombini, Giulia
Giacalone, Mauro
Marini, Alessandro
Martoccia, Lorenzo
Merulla, Andrea
Conference Name:
WCX SAE World Congress Experience (2025-04-08 : Detroit, Michigan, United States)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource cm
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2025
Summary:
Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS) structures offer the possibility of reinventing structural parts and heat exchangers to obtain higher efficiency and lighter or even multi-functional components. The crescent global climate concern has led to increasingly stringent emissions regulations and the adoption of TPMS represents a resourceful tool for OEMs to downsize and lighten mechanical parts, thereby reducing the overall vehicle weight and the fuel consumption. In particular, TPMS structures are gaining growing interest in the heat exchanger field as their morphology allows them to naturally house two separate fluids, thus ensuring heat transfer without mixing. Moreover, TPMS-based heat exchangers can offer countless possible design configurations. These structures are obtained by periodic repetitions in the three spatial dimensions of a specific unit cell with defined dimensions and wall thickness. By tuning their characteristic parameters, the structure can be tailored to obtain the desired weight, surface-to-volume ratio and strength. In the light of this, the paper provides a numerical comparison between two different unit cell types and four different unit cell dimensions to identify the most suitable parameter combination of a water-engine oil heat exchanger exploiting a TPMS structure. Based on previous work, the Gyroid and Diamond cell types are considered as the most promising structures, while the considered cell dimensions are 5, 6, 8 and 12 mm. For a fair comparison, the specimens share the same volume and wall thickness, which is chosen to minimize thermal conductive resistance and concurrently is the minimum value required by technological and structural requirements. The specimens are tested at four mass flow rate combinations of engine oil and water, representative of an automotive oil cooler. Finally, the structures are compared in terms of the computed pressure drops and heat transfer. In addition, a plate-fin heat exchanger with turbulators is added to the comparison to discuss the potentials of this innovative structures with respect to conventional solutions
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2025-01-8155
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account