My Account Log in

1 option

A Comparative Study of Strain Gauge and Load Cell-Based RLD Methods for Assessing Structural Durability Loads in Engine Mounts Tata Motors Limited

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Hazra, Sandip, author.
Contributor:
Khan, Arkadip
Mohare, Gourishkumar
Conference Name:
WCX SAE World Congress Experience (2025-04-08 : Detroit, Michigan, United States)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource cm
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2025
Summary:
In the ongoing Road Load Data Acquisition (RLDA) for engine mounts, a load cell arrangement is being utilized, where the load cell must be placed between the mount arm and an engine mount bracket or an additional tower bracket. This configuration required the design of a custom mount arm with a crank in the Z direction, secured with a single bolt to accommodate the load cell. However, this method has revealed significant load coupling in the X and Z directions, resulting in incorrect load prediction for engine mount testing. This happens due to the architectural packaging of the engine mount on the long member to meet NVH requirements.To mitigate these issues, an alternative strain gauge-based RLDA approach was investigated. The optimal locations for strain gauge placement were determined using the inverse matrix method with the assistance of Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) analysis. Strain gauges were then installed at these identified locations on the mount arm. The engine mount, now equipped with strain gauges, was tested in a real vehicle under standardized driving conditions and tracks. The strain data obtained was subsequently converted into load signals through the inverse method, demonstrating a substantial reduction in coupling effects compared to the load cell arrangement.This method not only provided more accurate load data but also presented a reliable alternative for RLD collection in engine mounts. A detailed case study is included to illustrate the correlation and effectiveness of this newly proposed RLDA process
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2025-01-8257
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account