My Account Log in

1 option

Numerical Simulation of Drive Cycles for Formula Electric Vehicle Comparative Powerflow Analysis Federal University of Lavras (DEG/UFLA), Engineering Departm

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Rodrigues, Patrícia Mainardi Tortorelli, author.
Contributor:
Silveira, Henrique Leandro
Conference Name:
SAE Brasil 2024 Congress (2024-10-16 : Sao Paolo, Brazil)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource cm
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2024
Summary:
This paper proposes a theoretical drive cycle for the competition, considering the battery pack project under design. The vehicle has a non-reversible, double-stage gear train, created without a dynamic investigation. To evaluate the effect on performance, several ratios were analyzed. Dynamic model uses Eksergian's Equation of Motion to evaluate car equivalent mass (generalized inertia), and external forces acting on the vehicle. The circuit is divided into key locations where the driver is likely to accelerate or brake, based on a predicted behavior. MATLAB ODE Solver executed the numerical integration, evaluating time forward coordinates, creating the drive cycle. Linear gear train results provided data as boundary conditions for a second round of simulations performed with epicyclic gear trains. Model is updated to include their nonlinearity by differential algebraic equation employment with Lagrange multipliers. All data undergoes evaluation to ascertain the mechanical and electrical power requirements. Subsequent analysis aims to comprehend the peak electrical current and energy storage demands of the battery pack, ensuring the car performs in competition as simulated. Whereas reference gear train ratio returns a good time frame, its energy usage surpasses competition rules. Other implemented ratios demonstrated whether an improvement in time frame or an improvement in energy usage. Upgrading one downgrades the other, for instance, speed reduction of 6.0:1 needs 60% more time for a lap than the fastest, but has the lowest energy usage. This behavior justifies epicyclic gear train investigation. Comparison of both models indicate enough evidence that car performance improves with epicyclic gear train appliance. Epicyclic gear train enhances power flow while improving energy management. It can be up to 16 seconds faster (Np=3 v3) than the reference train (9.0:1) and uses nearly the same amount of energy as 6.0:1 ratio
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2024-36-0097
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account