My Account Log in

1 option

Impact of Range Extender Engine Configuration on Powertrain Performance and Vehicle Integration Dumarey USA

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Hoth, Alexander, author.
Contributor:
Bunce, Mike
Marion, Joshua
Peters, Nathan
Pothuraju Subramanyam, Sai Krishna
Silvano, Peter
Conference Name:
SAE Energy and Propulsion Conference (2025-10-14 : Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource cm
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2025
Summary:
The light-duty transportation sector is experiencing a worldwide push towards reduced carbon intensity. One pathway that has been developed focuses on replacing internal combustion engine (ICE)-based vehicles with full-electric battery electric vehicles (BEV), which offer local carbon dioxide (CO2)-free mobility. However, batteries offer a limited mobility range and can require long recharging times, leading to a limited range perception among some vehicle operators. A range-extended electric vehicle (REEV) utilizes a small ICE to mitigate the range concerns of BEVs, while also enabling a battery size reduction with its associated improvements in cost, weight, and manufacturing-related CO2 intensity.A previous study by the authors discussed evaluation criteria for range extender engines (REx) and compared additive technology options to enable cost-, efficiency, or power-optimized REEV applications using a modular approach. This study contrasts the dedicated REx with associated modular additive technology packages against a commercially available ICE vehicle and a BEV. This study furthermore investigates the impact of REx configurations on vehicle powertrain parameters, including battery sizing, total system cost, energy split, and combined vehicle range. A range extender powertrain was found to offer a total cost of ownership (TCO) benefit compared to conventional ICE powertrains and offers significant vehicle weight advantages over current high-range BEVs. A cost-optimized REx was found to be optimal for low-power drive cycles and those with high percentages of electric driving. The high-efficiency REx offered a cost advantage for high-power drive cycles, long daily commutes, or where battery recharging infrastructure is limited
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2025-01-0386
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account