My Account Log in

1 option

A Systematic Literature Review on Safety of the Intended Functionality for Automated Driving Systems Institute for Driver Assistance and Connected Mobility

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Patel, Milin, author.
Contributor:
Jung, Rolf
Khatun, Marzana
Conference Name:
Automotive Technical Papers (2025-01-01 : Warrendale, Pennsylvania, United States)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource cm
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2025
Summary:
In the automobile industry, ensuring the safety of automated vehicles equipped with the automated driving system (ADS) is becoming a significant focus due to the increasing development and deployment of automated driving. Automated driving depends on sensing both the external and internal environments of a vehicle, utilizing perception sensors and algorithms, and electrical/electronic (E/E) systems for situational awareness and response. ISO 21448 is the standard for Safety of the Intended Functionality (SOTIF) that aims to ensure that the ADS operate safely within their intended functionality. SOTIF focuses on preventing or mitigating potential hazards that may arise from the limitations or failures of the ADS, including hazards due to insufficiencies of specification, or performance insufficiencies, as well as foreseeable misuse of the intended functionality. However, the challenge lies in ensuring the safety of vehicles despite the limited availability of extensive and systematic literature on SOTIF. To address this challenge, a systematic literature review (SLR) on SOTIF for the ADS is performed following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The objective is to methodically gather and analyze the existing literature on SOTIF. The major contributions of this paper are: (i) presenting a summary of the literature by synthesizing and organizing the collective findings, methodologies, and insights into distinct thematic groups, and (ii) summarizing and categorizing the acknowledged limitations based on data extracted from an SLR of 51 research papers published between 2018 and 2023. Furthermore, research gaps are determined, a comparative analysis of methods supporting SOTIF is provided, and supplementary insights from recent publications that address these gaps are presented. Based on the findings, future research directions are proposed
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2025-01-5030
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account