My Account Log in

1 option

SoC Estimation for LFP Battery Using Extended Kalman Filter and Particle Filter with Adaptive Battery Parameters Indian Institute of Techology

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Ns, Farhan Ahamed Hameed, author.
Contributor:
Jha, Kaushal
Shankar Ram, C S.
Conference Name:
11th SAEINDIA International Mobility Conference (SIIMC 2024) (2024-12-11 : New Delhi, India)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource cm
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2024
Summary:
In recent years, Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) has become a popular choice for Li-ion battery (LIB) chemistry in Electric Vehicles (EVs) and energy storage systems (ESS) due to its safety, long lifecycle, absence of cobalt and nickel, and reliance on common raw materials, which mitigates supply chain challenges. State-of-charge (SoC) is a crucial parameter for optimal and safe battery operation. With advancements in battery technology, there is an increasing need to develop and refine existing estimation techniques for accurately determining critical battery parameters like SoC. LFP batteries' flat voltage characteristics over a wide SoC range challenge traditional SoC estimation algorithms, leading to less accurate estimations. To address these challenges, this study proposes EKF and PF-based SoC estimation algorithms for LFP batteries. A second-order RC Equivalent Circuit Model (ECM) was used as the dynamic battery model, with model parameters varying as a function of SoC and accounting for temperature variations. The Hybrid Pulse Power Characterization (HPPC) test was performed at 15°C, 25°C, 35°C, and 45°C, and model parameters were obtained using the Nelder-Mead simplex algorithm. Simulations were conducted on MATLAB Simulink and validated using the Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicle Test Procedure (WLTP) and Modified Indian Drive Cycle (MIDC). The proposed methods were evaluated for Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and computation time. Results showed that PF outperformed EKF by 40% regarding RMSE for WLTP and MIDC profiles. However, EKF computations were 90% faster than PF. The study concludes that EKF and PF can effectively be utilized for SoC estimation of LFP batteries, providing valuable insights for future Battery Management Systems (BMSs)
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2024-28-0223
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account