My Account Log in

1 option

Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment for Complex EE-Architectures MB-Technology

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Schubotz, Schubotz, author.
Conference Name:
SAE 2010 World Congress & Exhibition (2010-04-13 : Detroit, Michigan, United States)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2010
Summary:
Almost all new functions in a modern car have to be integrated into the existing EE-Architecture of the automobile. It is a challenge by itself to achieve a correct functional behavior across a complex network of various communication systems, gateways and multifunctional electronic control units. The method of physical distribution of sub-functions into such a network and the following functional consolidation of the decomposition have been used for years and will not change. The functional safety of the growing number of direct interventions into vehicle dynamics systems like steering, braking, and acceleration must be carefully analyzed.Does the standard hazard analysis and risk assessment provide enough information to develop dependable safety architectures? Do we understand the impact of consecutive faults and what may cause them to be triggered? Do we fully understand the functionality of carry-over electronics?This paper reports on a concept to increase transparency of connected risks in a distributed and complex architecture. It describes an approach to extend the standard hazard analysis and risk assessment. All physical elements are taken into account, which are allocated to the function under investigation. Initially it deals with the question how to determine the safety integrity of all those distributed elements, each of which contributes in a certain role to fulfill the main function. It describes an approach to build a global risk model, which defines the relation of functional criticality of the elements and the associated integrity levels. Furthermore, it shows how the risk model is mapped to the physical vehicle architecture. For example, the resulting "foot print" will provide initial integrity requirements for control units, gateways, sensors and actuators.Lastly, it outlines the idea to utilize the analysis results to increase the overall vehicle safety integrity for all on-board systems. The consolidation of the analyses of different vehicle functions will automatically identify the accumulation of critical integrity requests for global elements of the vehicle EE-Architecture. Thus the overall vehicle safety architecture can be developed in an iterative way to achieve high effectiveness by balanced measures for functional safety
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2010-01-0029
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account