My Account Log in

1 option

Refrigerants Selection for Automotive Air Conditioning System in Tropical Climates Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais (CEFE

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Oliveira Dias, Vinícius José de, author.
Contributor:
Barbieri, Paulo Eduardo Lopes
Freitas Paulino, Tiago de
Moreira, Thiago Augusto Araújo
Santos, Alex Henrique
Conference Name:
SAE Brasil 2025 Congress (2025-10-07 : Sao Paolo, Brazil)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource cm
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2025
Summary:
Automotive air conditioning systems are essential for ensuring thermal comfort for passengers. However, these systems require the elimination of refrigerants with high Global Warming Potential (GWP) and a transition toward more environmentally friendly alternatives. For many years, R134a has been the industry standard in automotive applications, following the phase-out of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) such as R12. This study evaluates the energy efficiency and environmental impact of several refrigerants in automotive air conditioning systems in tropical climates. A comprehensive literature review is conducted to select the refrigerants to be compared with R134a. The following is chosen: R1234yf, R744 (CO2), R290, R600a and R152a. Then a mathematical model is prepared and validated. The deviation between the results presented by the mathematical model and those in the literature varies from -1.21% to 8.33%. The simulation results suggest that the Coefficient of Performance (COP) of R152a and R600a is approximately 3% higher than that of R134a. However, these fluids are flammable, requiring additional safety investments. While R1234yf shows a slight loss in efficiency, at almost 4% lower than R134a, it offers a degree of compatibility due to its similar overall properties. The performance of R290 is slightly worse, while that of R744 is significantly lower. Finally, the environmental analysis based on TEWI indicates that R152a and R600a result in a slightly lower impact compared to R134a. In contrast, R290 and R1234yf exhibit a slightly higher environmental impact than R134a
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2025-36-0143
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account