My Account Log in

1 option

Legislating against liberties how Congress suppresses constitutional rights after wars Harry Blain

JSTOR Path to Open Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Blain, Harry, Author.
Series:
Constitutional thinking
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
War and emergency legislation--United States.
War and emergency legislation.
Legislative power--United States.
Legislative power.
War and emergency powers--United States.
War and emergency powers.
Civil rights--United States.
Civil rights.
United States--History--Civil War, 1861-1865.
United States.
World War, 1914-1918--United States.
World War, 1914-1918.
World War, 1939-1945--United States.
World War, 1939-1945.
Vietnam War, 1961-1975--United States.
Vietnam War, 1961-1975.
Physical Description:
1 online resource
Place of Publication:
Lawrence, Kansas University Press of Kansas [2026]
Summary:
"A sobering and eye-opening indictment that Congress has consistently been the most dangerous branch of government when it comes to protecting, and undermining, civil liberties—particularly in the wake of military conflict.Why do wartime restrictions on civil liberties outlive their original justifications? Scholars have long argued that the blame lies with the executive branch of government. Their logic is straightforward: during war, lawmakers require (in Alexander Hamilton’s words) “decision, activity, secrecy, and dispatch,” so they choose to enable executive leadership. Executives promise to wield extraordinary powers temporarily, only to entrench them indefinitely. This book tests how these claims hold up in four pivotal moments in US history: the Civil War, World War I, World War II, and Vietnam. Ultimately, it finds them wanting.Harry Blain argues that national legislators are decisive in sustaining postwar restrictions on civil liberties. These elected officials have formidable tools at their disposal, including powers over the rules and membership of their own institution, the funding and personnel of the executive branch, the jurisdiction of federal courts, and the priorities of state and local governments. These tools make Congress, not the executive, the primary institutional threat to civil liberties in the aftermath of war. For example, the House used its exclusion power to refuse to seat the socialist Victor Berger, disenfranchising voters in the process; Congress used its power to compel testimony during the Red Scares in an effort to discredit and humiliate their political enemies; and legislators have removed, or threatened to remove, Supreme Court jurisdiction over habeas corpus petitions throughout US history.In a time where the president and the Supreme Court are seen as the most dangerous branches of government, Legislating Against Liberties is a sober reminder that Congress has historically been at the vanguard of undermining democracy and liberty"-- JSTOR
Contents:
Introduction : the most dangerous branch
Repressive legislation
Independent tools
Congress and the executive
Congress and the judiciary
Congress and the states
The Vietnam anomaly
Epilogue : civil liberties in the age of Trump
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references and index
Online resource; title from PDF title page (JSTOR, viewed April 6, 2026)
Other Format:
Print version Blain, Harry Legislating against liberties
ISBN:
9780700641079
0700641076
9780700641062
0700641068
OCLC:
1583238587

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account