1 option
Legislating against liberties how Congress suppresses constitutional rights after wars Harry Blain
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Blain, Harry, Author.
- Series:
- Constitutional thinking
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- War and emergency legislation--United States.
- War and emergency legislation.
- Legislative power--United States.
- Legislative power.
- War and emergency powers--United States.
- War and emergency powers.
- Civil rights--United States.
- Civil rights.
- United States--History--Civil War, 1861-1865.
- United States.
- World War, 1914-1918--United States.
- World War, 1914-1918.
- World War, 1939-1945--United States.
- World War, 1939-1945.
- Vietnam War, 1961-1975--United States.
- Vietnam War, 1961-1975.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource
- Place of Publication:
- Lawrence, Kansas University Press of Kansas [2026]
- Summary:
- "A sobering and eye-opening indictment that Congress has consistently been the most dangerous branch of government when it comes to protecting, and undermining, civil liberties—particularly in the wake of military conflict.Why do wartime restrictions on civil liberties outlive their original justifications? Scholars have long argued that the blame lies with the executive branch of government. Their logic is straightforward: during war, lawmakers require (in Alexander Hamilton’s words) “decision, activity, secrecy, and dispatch,” so they choose to enable executive leadership. Executives promise to wield extraordinary powers temporarily, only to entrench them indefinitely. This book tests how these claims hold up in four pivotal moments in US history: the Civil War, World War I, World War II, and Vietnam. Ultimately, it finds them wanting.Harry Blain argues that national legislators are decisive in sustaining postwar restrictions on civil liberties. These elected officials have formidable tools at their disposal, including powers over the rules and membership of their own institution, the funding and personnel of the executive branch, the jurisdiction of federal courts, and the priorities of state and local governments. These tools make Congress, not the executive, the primary institutional threat to civil liberties in the aftermath of war. For example, the House used its exclusion power to refuse to seat the socialist Victor Berger, disenfranchising voters in the process; Congress used its power to compel testimony during the Red Scares in an effort to discredit and humiliate their political enemies; and legislators have removed, or threatened to remove, Supreme Court jurisdiction over habeas corpus petitions throughout US history.In a time where the president and the Supreme Court are seen as the most dangerous branches of government, Legislating Against Liberties is a sober reminder that Congress has historically been at the vanguard of undermining democracy and liberty"-- JSTOR
- Contents:
- Introduction : the most dangerous branch
- Repressive legislation
- Independent tools
- Congress and the executive
- Congress and the judiciary
- Congress and the states
- The Vietnam anomaly
- Epilogue : civil liberties in the age of Trump
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references and index
- Online resource; title from PDF title page (JSTOR, viewed April 6, 2026)
- Other Format:
- Print version Blain, Harry Legislating against liberties
- ISBN:
- 9780700641079
- 0700641076
- 9780700641062
- 0700641068
- OCLC:
- 1583238587
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.