1 option
Islamic Jurisprudence and the Role of Custom : A Comparative Case Study of Saudi Arabia and Iran / Sumeyra Yakar.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Yakar, Sumeyra, Author.
- Series:
- The Modern Muslim World ; 13
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Customary law (Islamic law).
- Customary law--Iran.
- Customary law.
- Customary law--Saudi Arabia.
- Divorce--Law and legislation--Iran.
- Divorce.
- Divorce--Law and legislation--Saudi Arabia.
- Marriage law--Iran.
- Marriage law.
- Marriage law--Saudi Arabia.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (301 p.)
- Place of Publication:
- Piscataway, NJ : Gorgias Press, [2022]
- Language Note:
- In English.
- Summary:
- The book argues for the importance of custom (‘urf) in the application of Islamic law in Iran and Saudi Arabia. Irrespective of whether there is a direct reference to ‘urf, the interpretation and use of Islamic legal principles have a relatively close connection to the surrounding contextual environment and customs. The extensive use of customary norms in the absence of legal sources or in the course of interpretation of legal texts are in excess of the permitted legal limits. The book compares the diversity of legal opinions and court verdicts between the two countries by placing a particular emphasis upon the usage of ‘urf, whether in the form of a legal principle with semi-independent style or the form of a subsidiary source that is dependent upon various legal principles. The latter includes istiḥsān, (common practice), istiṣlāḥ (common good), istiṣḥāb (presumption of continuity) sadd al-dharā’i‘ (blocking the means), ḍarūra (necessity), and siyāsa shar‘iyya (politics in accordance with the Islamic law). The study compares approaches adopted by Saudi-Ḥanbalī and Iranian-Ja‘farī scholars towards the shar‘ī status of ‘urf (custom) in three particular categories; the methodological perspective (classic and contemporary), the shar‘ī opinions of scholars (fatwā) and the court verdicts of judges (aḥkām). It illustrates the ways in which scholars achieve different implementations in their sharī‘a systems through the application of direct or indirect ‘urf. In addition, the book examines the extent to which the shar‘ī regulations have been altered or sustained through the prioritisation of the legal concept of ‘urf. The attitude of ‘ulamā’ (religious scholars) towards the application of ‘urf demonstrates that both the classical Ḥanbalī and Ja‘farī schools have approved the validity of ‘urf in the shar‘ī area. This applies both to direct usage of ‘urf and manipulations of its utility by rational explanations or secondary legal principles.
- Contents:
- The place of custom in Saudi Arabia and Iranian legal systems
- The legal position of Ḥanbalī and Jaʻfarī schools towards custom
- Marriage and divorce regulations in Saudi Arabia
- Marriage and divorce regulations in Iran.
- Notes:
- Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 24. Mai 2022)
- ISBN:
- 1-4632-4352-9
- OCLC:
- 1322125182
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.