1 option
Theology in the Age of Scientific Reasoning / Nancey Murphy.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Murphy, Nancey C., author.
- Series:
- Cornell Studies in the Philosophy of Religion Series
- Cornell Studies in the Philosophy of Religion
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Religion and science.
- Theology--Methodology.
- Theology.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (xii, 215 p. :) ill. ;
- Edition:
- 1st ed.
- Place of Publication:
- Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press, [2018]
- Language Note:
- In English.
- Summary:
- In this timely and provocative book, Nancey Murphy sets out to dispel skepticism regarding Christian belief. She argues for the rationality of Christian belief by showing that theological reasoning is similar to scientific reasoning as described by contemporary philosophy of science. Murphy draws on new historicist accounts of science, particularly that of lmre Lakatos. According to Lakatos, scientists work within a "research program" consisting of a fixed core theory and a series of changing auxiliary hypotheses that allow for prediction and explanation of novel facts: Murphy argues that strikingly similar patterns of reasoning can be used to justify theological assertions. She provides an original characterization of theological data and explores the consequences for theology and philosophy of religion of adopting such an approach.
- Contents:
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- 1. The Problem-Theological Method in the Age of Probable Reasoning
- 2. The Quest for Theological Method-Pannenberg versus Hume
- 3. Probable Reasoning Come of Age-Philosophy of Science
- 4. The Modernists-Testing the Method
- 5. Data for Theology
- 6. Scientific Theology
- Index
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references and index.
- Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 26. Mrz 2019)
- Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
- ISBN:
- 9781501724534
- 1501724533
- OCLC:
- 1080550333
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.