1 option
Politics and Policy Making in the UK / Paul Cairney and Sean Kippin.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Cairney, Paul, 1973- author.
- Kippin, Sean, author.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Policy sciences.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (441 pages)
- Edition:
- First edition.
- Place of Publication:
- Bristol, England : Bristol University Press, [2024]
- Summary:
- Written by leading voices in UK public policy and politics, this text examines the shifting UK political and policy landscape while also highlighting the features of politics that have endured. The book equips students with a robust understanding of public policy and enables them to locate this within a broader theoretical framework.
- Contents:
- Front Cover
- Half-title
- Series page
- Politics and Policy Making in the UK
- Copyright information
- Table of Contents
- List of Figures, Tables and Boxes
- About the Authors
- Acknowledgements
- Preface: How to Analyse UK Policy Making
- No One Is in Control or Knows What They Are Doing
- Further Resources
- 1 Introducing UK Politics and Policy Making
- The purpose and approach of this book
- Comparing explanations of UK policy making
- The Westminster model: a story of how policy should be made
- Complex government: a story of how policy is actually made
- Complex government and wicked problems
- Bringing both stories together
- The approach of the book
- The structure of the book
- Case studies in politics and policy making: responding to crisis?
- 2 Perspectives on Policy and Policy Making
- Introduction: The importance of many perspectives
- Policy analysis: a five-step guide (and its limits)
- 1. Define a policy problem
- 2. Identify feasible solutions
- 3. Use value-based criteria and political goals to compare solutions
- 4. Predict the outcome of each feasible solution
- 5. Make a recommendation to your client
- What do policy analysts actually do?
- Stages as functional requirements, not part of a cycle
- Policy studies: the ideal-type policy process
- Policy studies: how is policy really made?
- How could policy makers respond to bounded rationality?
- Punctuated equilibrium theory (and policy communities)
- Power and ideas
- Multiple streams analysis
- Institutions and new institutionalism
- Social construction and policy design
- Advocacy coalition framework
- Narrative policy framework
- Policy learning
- A simple representation of the policy-making environment
- Critical policy analysis: challenging how policy is made
- Stone's policy paradox.
- Bacchi's What's the Problem Represented to Be?
- Policy analysis for marginalised groups
- Decolonising research
- Critical race theory
- The implications for policy analysis and policy studies
- Who should be involved in policy analysis and policy making?
- The perils of focusing on heroic individuals
- Challenging the status quo: should policy making be pragmatic and incremental?
- Bringing these three perspectives together
- Conclusion
- 3 Explaining UK Politics and Policy Making
- Introduction: Two ways to understand policy making in the UK
- The Westminster model: a story of centralised power and control
- Disenchantment and the Westminster model
- Politics is too far removed from 'the people'
- The political class does not represent the public
- Politicians take power but not responsibility
- Complex government: a story of limited central control
- The pragmatic case for delegating policy attention
- The normative case for delegating key functions of government
- The multi-level nature of policy and policy making
- The fragmented nature of policy making
- Policy inheritance and the complexity of the statute book
- How have policy makers responded to complex government?
- What happens when these two stories collide?
- The pragmatic response to complex government
- Centralisation versus pragmatism
- The enduring effect of the Westminster model of accountability
- Policy-making studies: examining key actors and their environments
- Explaining the impact of key actors: ministers and the core executive
- Explaining the impact of key actors: parliaments
- 4 The Transformation of the UK State
- Introduction
- What do we mean by UK state transformation?
- Economic policy: from Keynesianism to neoliberalism?
- The rise, fall and reinvention of Keynesianism.
- 1940s and 1950s: UK government policy changes consistent with Keynesian thought
- 1960s: making state intervention work by modifying a Keynesian approach
- 1970s: a series of crises
- 1979-1997: a rejection of Keynesianism?
- 1997 onwards: a mix of 'neoliberal' aims and 'new Keynesian' policies
- Employment law reform and trade unions
- Privatisation and new public management
- Selling nationalised industries
- The privatisation of housing
- Charging for public services (including university tuition fees)
- Using non-governmental organisations to deliver services
- Reforming public services: quasi-markets in health and education
- Reforming the National Health Service
- Reforming education
- Reforming the civil service, 'policy advisory systems' and delivery
- Trends in spending and regulation: from state to personal responsibility?
- The role of the state in relation to individual and family health and welfare policies
- How did devolution influence state transformation?
- Healthcare
- Education
- Local government
- Social housing
- Public expenditure
- Reforming government
- 5 What Does State Transformation Tell Us about the UK Policy Process?
- What was the UK policy style during state transformation?
- Did Thatcherism signal the end of policy communities?
- Do the early post-war communities resemble modern networks?
- Did policy change incrementally or in radical bursts?
- Punctuated equilibrium theory: policy change is a function of attention
- Hall's paradigm shift in economic policy: major change follows failure
- Rapid paradigm shifts in economic policy are rare and incomplete
- State transformation: trial and error, not a grand plan
- What is the impact of these changes on government? Did they foster a 'lean' or 'hollow' state?.
- How did governments react to the impact of these reforms?
- How did governments describe the impact of these reforms?
- UK transformation: part of a global neoliberal trend?
- 6 Crises and Policy Making: The UK Response to COVID-19
- Introduction: How did policy makers address an existential crisis?
- Policy analysis: how to address the policy problem
- Step 1: How could governments define COVID-19 as a policy problem?
- 1. The minimal intervention story
- 2. The maximal intervention story
- Step 2: Identifying feasible solutions
- Steps 3 and 4: Using values and goals to compare solutions and predicting the outcomes of solutions
- What would a cost-benefit analysis look like?
- Step 5: Making recommendations
- How did the UK and devolved governments respond to COVID-19?
- How did the UK government define the problem?
- Did the devolved governments define the problem differently?
- What policy solutions did the UK and devolved governments select?
- Phase 1: Government advice and voluntary behaviour (until mid-March 2020)
- Phase 2: A rapid shift to enforced lockdown (late March to mid-May 2020)
- Phase 3: Partial lockdown release, 'circuit breakers' and intermittent lockdowns (May 2020 to spring 2022)
- Reducing some restrictions on individual and business behaviour (May-October 2020)
- Local or regional restrictions (summer to October 2020)
- Reimposing temporary lockdowns or 'circuit breakers' (autumn 2020 to spring 2021)
- Lockdown releases (from late March/early April 2021)
- Phase 4: Living with COVID-19 (from March 2022)
- What do these experiences tell us about Westminster and complex government stories?
- Bounded rationality: understanding and defining the policy problem
- Controlling the policy process and the outcomes of choices
- Critical policy analysis: whose lives matter to policy makers?.
- To what extent did UK COVID-19 policies address health inequalities?
- Conclusion: Did COVID-19 change UK policy for good?
- 7 Constitutional Policy: Brexit
- Introduction: Did the UK take back control?
- Policy analysis: what exactly is the problem?
- The Brexit referendum: a poor solution to an ill-defined political problem
- The Brexit debate: a catch-all solution to too many problems
- Analysing the vote for Brexit as a policy problem
- Step 1: How could actors define the vote for Brexit as a policy problem?
- Soft Brexit: remain a member of the economic, but not political, union
- Hard Brexit: leave the economic union and seek a new trading agreement with the EU
- No-Deal Brexit: go it alone, with no agreement possible
- Hold a second referendum to check if people want this Brexit
- Steps 3 and 4: Using values and goals to compare solutions, and predicting the outcomes of solutions
- What forms of multi-level policy making are feasible (and fair)?
- What was the actual consequence of Brexit on policy and policy making?
- Critical policy analysis: who wins or loses from Brexit?
- Conclusion: How does Brexit inform our Westminster and complex government stories?
- 8 Environmental Policy: Climate Change and Sustainability
- Introduction: Climate change as the ultimate 'wicked' problem
- Step 1: How could governments define climate change as a policy problem?
- What exactly is UK environmental policy?
- How did the UK and devolved governments respond to climate change?
- How has the UK government defined the problem?.
- What climate change commitments did UK governments introduce?.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references and index.
- Description based on print version record.
- ISBN:
- 1-5292-2237-0
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.