2 options
An ed-tech tragedy? : Educational technologies and school closures in the time of COVID-19 / Mark West.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- West, Mark (Writer on mobile learning), author.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Educational technology.
- Social distancing (Public health) and education.
- COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020-2023--Psychological aspects.
- COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020-2023.
- Distance education.
- Web-based instruction.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource
- Edition:
- 1st ed.
- Place of Publication:
- 2025.
- New York ; London : Routledge : UNESCO, 2025.
- Summary:
- The COVID-19 pandemic pushed education from schools to educational technologies at a pace and scale with no historical precedent. For hundreds of millions of students formal learning became fully dependent on technology - whether internet-connected digital devices, televisions or radios.
- Contents:
- Cover
- Short Summary
- Testimonials
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Contents
- Epigraph
- Summary
- Organization
- Genesis and research methods
- Introduction
- Defining ed-tech
- The origins and rise of ed-tech
- Ed-tech and technology solutionism
- Why tragedy?
- Situating the disruption
- A Netflix moment for commercial ed-tech
- Act 1: The hope of tech salvation
- Reformatting schools with technology
- The Proteus of machines and a new edifice for education
- All it takes is a hole in the wall
- The stage is set for ed-tech
- Cut the red tape and catapult education to a better future
- Act 2: From promises to reality
- Most learners were left behind
- Ed-tech? What ed-tech?
- Technology barriers mirrored and widened existing divides
- Heightened demand for connectivity and devices put a strain on poor families
- A dearth of digital skills prevented teaching and learning
- Teachers were unprepared to support remote learning
- Inequalities were supercharged
- Learning by radio versus real-time, teacher-led video
- Digital aspirations and investments favoured the privileged
- Efforts to leapfrog progress skipped over disadvantaged learners
- Variable connectivity quality and new forms of digital exclusion
- Efforts to provide digital skills training left low-level users behind
- Technology privileged families with time to support education at home
- Wealthy families found alternative solutions
- Sociocultural differences put poor families at a disadvantage
- School-based inequities were amplified in the transition to remote learning
- No room for anywhere learning and fixed times for anytime education
- Video classes made inequity jarringly visible
- Hardship and heightened exclusion for students with disabilities
- An amplification of digital gender divides.
- A step backwards for the labour participation of mothers
- School closures contributed to increases in child labour
- Learners engaged less, achieved less and left state-provisioned education
- Time dedicated to education declined dramatically
- Lower and slower learning gains with online learning
- Disengagement and dropout followed the shift to ed-tech
- A flight from public education to home-schooling
- Education was narrowed and impoverished
- Engines of socialization and acculturation slowed
- Student well-being and protection was neglected in digital spaces
- A void of support to navigate bereavement
- Technology stifled pedagogical possibilities and the agency of teachers
- Corporate aesthetics and linguistic hegemony replaced the vibrancy of the classroom
- Automation, standardization and homogenization of the learning process
- Immersion in technology was unhealthy
- Negative impacts of increased screen time
- Pains, weight gain and malnutrition
- Physical education online and in isolation
- Touchless worlds
- A retreat into games and proto-metaverses
- A subversion of learning to live together
- Zoom dysmorphia and digital excarnation
- Isolation, invisibility and alienation in school-less schooldays
- A parallel mental health pandemic among young people
- A digital conveyor belt of personalized learning and the normalization of learning alone
- Frustration and stress mark the transition into unfamiliar modes of digital learning
- The hidden dangers of rushed online immersion
- A curtailing of conversation
- Digital addiction and being alone together
- Ed-tech is poorly suited for young children
- Environmental tolls multiplied with the ed-tech boom
- New material and energy needs
- The mounting scourge of e-waste
- Ed-tech for some, mines and landfills for others.
- The private sector tightened its grip on public education
- Unprecedented growth and lucrative IPOs for commercial ed-tech providers
- Corporate dependencies and reduced government oversight
- Cultivating consumer behaviour in students, families and teachers
- Surveillance, control and machine processes marked the move to ed-tech
- New data gold and the many eyes of ed-tech surveillance
- Forced consent and new levers of control
- Privacy and personal data slip away in the digital environments of education
- Datafication of learning and humans
- Emotion-recognition technologies gain a toehold despite flimsy science
- Self-censorship and classroom control
- Technology aimed at individuals tilts educational research away from groups
- Automation and machine processes weaken teacher authority
- Fallible algorithms
- Remote proctoring, suspicion scores and software sedimentation
- Complexity, poor transparency and limited capacity make algorithmic audits rare
- Contesting spurious machine judgements and privacy overreach
- End of Act 2
- Inter-Act: Looking back to see ahead
- Looking Back
- School closures, the shift to remote learning and public health
- Did technology-mediated remote learning contribute to the prolongation of school closures?
- If not ed-tech, then what?
- Alternative A: Keeping schools open or reopening them quickly
- Alternative B: Pause formal education until the resumption of in-person schooling
- Alternative C: Focus on supporting caregivers and prioritizing non-technological learning resources
- Was COVID-19 an education crisis?
- Looking ahead
- Ed-tech finds a new rationale - resilience
- Is technology a pillar of educational resilience?
- If ed-tech is the answer, what is the question?
- Act 3: New directions for ed-tech
- Prioritize the best interests of students and teachers.
- Redesign online environments to centre students' needs
- Give teachers agency in ed-tech pedagogies
- Design codes, regulation and legislation to put students first
- Reaffirm the primacy of in-person learning
- Buttress schools as essential social institutions
- Guard against the homogenization of education
- Question the logic of technology solutionism
- Strengthen digital connectivity, capacities and content
- Centre the most marginalized in ed-tech planning and deployment
- Champion school-first and public connectivity as a step towards ed-tech inclusion
- Support the development of free, high-quality digital content and platforms
- Build digital capacities and foster pedagogical innovation
- Protect the right to education from shrinking ground
- Anchor the right to education in standards and definitions that prioritize in-person learning
- Ensure children's safety and well-being in physical and digital learning spaces
- Reconstruct ed-tech to support holistic education and accommodate educational diversity
- Conclusion
- Remembering the ed-tech experiences of the pandemic
- The arc of tragedy
- Reorienting and steering the digital transformation of education
- Works Cited
- Narrative Text
- Voices from the ground
- Figures
- Bibliography.
- Notes:
- "The Global Education 2030 Agenda"--title page verso.
- Originally published in 2023 by UNESCO.
- Includes bibliographical references.
- Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
- Other Format:
- Print version: West, Mark An Ed-Tech Tragedy?
- ISBN:
- 9781003664406
- 1-04-043587-4
- 1-04-043586-6
- 1-003-66440-7
- OCLC:
- 1545639263
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.