1 option
Hypersonic shock wave turbulent boundary layers : direct numerical simulation, large Eddy simulation and experiment / Doyle Knight and Nadia Kianvashrad.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Knight, Doyle, author.
- Kianvashrad, Nadia, author.
- Series:
- IOP Ebooks Series
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Fluid mechanics.
- Shock waves--Computer simulation.
- Shock waves.
- Turbulent boundary layer.
- Turbulent boundary layer--Computer simulation.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (630 pages)
- Edition:
- First edition.
- Place of Publication:
- Bristol, England : IOP Publishing, [2023]
- Summary:
- This book provides a comprehensive exposition of hypersonic turbulent boundary layers including the fundamental mathematical theory, structure of equilibrium boundary layers, and extensive surveys of Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS), Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and experiments.
- Contents:
- Intro
- Preface
- Author biographies
- Doyle Knight
- Nadia Kianvashrad
- Nomenclature
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- References
- Chapter 2 Mathematical theory
- Abstract
- 2.1 Navier-Stokes equations
- 2.2 Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations
- 2.2.1 Reynolds averaging
- 2.2.2 Favre averaging
- 2.3 Turbulent Prandtl and Lewis numbers
- 2.4 Large Eddy Simulation
- 2.4.1 Explicit Large Eddy Simulation
- 2.4.2 Implicit large eddy simulation
- 2.4.3 Wall modeled Large Eddy Simulation
- 2.5 Inflow boundary conditions
- 2.5.1 Forcing transition
- 2.5.2 Auxiliary simulation
- 2.5.3 Recycling and rescaling
- 2.5.4 Synthetic inflow turbulence
- 2.6 Reynolds number dependence
- Chapter 3 Equilibrium turbulent boundary layers
- 3.1 Incompressible Law of the Wall and Wake
- 3.2 Compressible velocity transformations
- 3.2.1 Van Driest transformation with no mass transfer at wall
- 3.2.2 Van Driest transformation with mass transfer at wall
- 3.2.3 Validity of Van Driest transformation
- 3.2.4 The other Van Driest transformation
- 3.2.5 Trettel and Larsson (2016)
- 3.2.6 Volpiani et al (2020)
- 3.2.7 Griffin et al (2021)
- 3.3 Mean velocity-mean temperature relations
- 3.3.1 Crocco-Busemann relation
- 3.3.2 Walz's relation
- 3.3.3 Zhang et al relation
- 3.3.4 Hypersonic velocity-total temperature relation
- 3.4 Reynolds Analogy Factor
- 3.4.1 Osborne Reynolds
- 3.4.2 Colburn (1933)
- 3.4.3 Van Driest
- 3.4.4 Turbulence model
- 3.5 Morkovin's hypothesis
- 3.6 Morkovin's Strong Reynolds Analogies
- 3.6.1 Strong Reynolds Analogy no. 1
- 3.6.2 Strong Reynolds Analogy no. 2
- 3.6.3 Strong Reynolds Analogy no. 3
- 3.6.4 Strong Reynolds Analogy no. 4
- 3.6.5 Strong Reynolds Analogy no. 5
- 3.6.6 Morkovin's analysis of the five Strong Reynolds Analogies.
- 3.7 Cebeci and Smith Strong Reynolds Analogy
- 3.8 Huang et al Strong Reynolds Analogy
- Chapter 4 Experiments-hypersonic turbulent boundary layers
- 4.1 Wegener et al (1953)
- 4.2 Winkler and Persh (1954)
- 4.3 Lobb et al (1955)
- 4.4 Hill (1956)
- 4.5 Hill (1959)
- 4.6 Winkler and Cha (1959)
- 4.7 Danberg (1964)
- 4.8 Adcock et al (1965)
- 4.9 Young (1965)
- 4.10 Scaggs (1966)
- 4.11 Samuels et al (1967)
- 4.12 Wallace (1967)
- 4.13 Wallace (1968, 1969)
- 4.14 Bushnell et al (1969)
- 4.15 Hoydysh and Zakkay (1969)
- 4.16 Lee et al (1969)
- 4.17 Matthews and Trimmer (1969)
- 4.18 Cary (1970)
- 4.19 Jones and Feller (1970)
- 4.20 Beckwith et al (1971)
- 4.21 Fischer et al (1971)
- 4.22 Hopkins and Inouye (1971)
- 4.23 Voisinet et al (1971)
- 4.24 Holden (1972)
- 4.25 Hopkins and Keener (1972)
- 4.26 Horstman and Owen (1972)
- 4.27 Keener and Hopkins (1972)
- 4.28 Keener and Polek (1972)
- 4.29 Kemp and Owen (1972)
- 4.30 Laderman and Demetriades (1971, 1973, 1974)
- 4.31 Stone and Cary (1972)
- 4.32 Voisinet and Lee (1972)
- 4.33 Backx (1973-1976)
- 4.34 Feller (1973)
- 4.35 Watson et al (1973)
- 4.36 Raman (1974)
- 4.37 Bloy (1975)
- 4.38 Mikulla and Horstman (1975)
- 4.39 Owen et al (1975)
- 4.40 Smith and Driscoll (1975)
- 4.41 Laderman (1976)
- 4.42 Berg (1977)
- 4.43 Materna (1977)
- 4.44 Owen and Calarese (1987)
- 4.45 McGinley et al (1994)
- 4.46 Holden and Chadwick (1995)
- 4.47 Auvity et al (2001)
- 4.48 Goyne et al (2003)
- 4.49 Suraweera et al (2006)
- 4.50 Maslov et al (2008)
- 4.51 Vaganov (2008)
- 4.52 Sahoo et al (2009)
- 4.53 Peltier et al (2011)
- 4.54 Tichenor et al (2013)
- 4.55 Neeb et al (2015)
- 4.56 Peltier et al (2016)
- 4.57 Tichenor et al (2017)
- 4.58 Williams and Smits (2017)
- 4.59 Neeb et al (2018)
- 4.60 Williams et al (2018).
- 4.61 Ding et al (2020)
- 4.62 Williams et al (2021)
- 4.63 Additional results
- Chapter 5 Experiments-hypersonic shock wave turbulent boundary layer interactions
- 5.1 Elfstrom (1972)
- 5.2 Coleman and Stollery (1972)
- 5.3 Holden (1972)
- 5.4 Appels (1973) and Richards and Appels (1973)
- 5.5 Coleman (1973)
- 5.6 Kussoy and Horstman (1975)
- 5.7 Law (1975)
- 5.8 Mikulla and Horstman (1976)
- 5.9 Holden (1977)
- 5.10 Neumann and Hayes (1977)
- 5.11 Zheltovodov et al (1979 and later)
- 5.12 Zheltovodov (1982)
- 5.13 Holden (1984)
- 5.14 Dolling and Rodi (1988)
- 5.15 Dolling and Smith (1989)
- 5.16 Kussoy and Horstman (1989)
- 5.17 Alvi and Settles (1990-2)
- 5.18 Kim et al (1990)
- 5.19 Disimile and Scaggs (1991)
- 5.20 Holden (1991)
- 5.21 Lee, Settles and Horstman (1992)
- 5.22 Rodi and Dolling (1992, 1995)
- 5.23 Vermeulen and Simeonides (1992)
- 5.24 Coët and Chanetz (1993)
- 5.25 Garrison et al (1993-6)
- 5.26 Kussoy and Horstman (1993)
- 5.27 Kussoy et al (1993)
- 5.28 Simeonides and Haase (1995)
- 5.29 Schülein et al (1996, 2001, 2006)
- 5.29.1 Planar incident shock
- 5.29.2 Sharp fin
- 5.29.3 Crossing shock
- 5.30 White and Ault (1996)
- 5.31 Babinsky and Edwards (1997)
- 5.32 Zheltovodov et al (1998)
- 5.33 Bookey et al (2005)
- 5.34 Prince et al (2005)
- 5.35 Benay et al (2006) and Bur and Chanetz (2009)
- 5.36 Murphree et al (2006, 2007)
- 5.37 Borovoy et al (2009, 2012)
- 5.38 Holden et al (2010)
- 5.39 Borovoy et al (2011, 2013)
- 5.40 Murray et al (2013)
- 5.41 Willems and Gülhan (2013) and Willems et al (2015)
- 5.42 Holden et al (2014)-hollow cylinder flare
- 5.43 Holden et al (2014)-cone flare
- 5.44 Borovoy et al (2016)
- 5.45 Wagner et al (2016)
- 5.46 Schreyer et al (2018)
- 5.47 Currao et al (2020)
- 5.48 Chang et al (2021)
- 5.49 Zhao et al (2021).
- References
- Chapter 6 Direct Numerical Simulation and Large Eddy Simulation-boundary layers
- 6.1 Maeder et al (2001)
- 6.2 Li et al (2006)
- 6.3 Pino Martín (2007)
- 6.4 Duan, Beekman and Pino Martín (2010)
- 6.5 Duan, Beekman and Pino Martín (2011)
- 6.6 Duan and Pino Martín (2011)
- 6.7 Duan and Pino Martín (2011)
- 6.8 Liang et al (2012, 2013)
- 6.9 Chu et al (2013)
- 6.10 Duan et al (2016)
- 6.11 Zhang et al (2017)
- 6.12 Zhang et al (2018)
- 6.13 Huang et al (2020)
- 6.14 Nicholson et al (2021a)
- 6.15 Nicholson et al (2021b)
- 6.16 Kianvashrad and Knight (2021-2)
- Chapter 7 Direct Numerical Simulation and Large Eddy Simulation-shock boundary layer interaction
- 7.1 Edwards et al (2008)
- 7.2 Sandham et al (2014)
- 7.3 Fang et al (2015)
- 7.4 Yang et al (2018)
- 7.5 Fu et al (2020)
- 7.6 Vopiani et al (2020)
- 7.7 Fu et al (2021)
- 7.8 Priebe and Martín (2021)
- Chapter 8 Discussion and future needs
- 8.1 Equilibrium turbulent boundary layer
- 8.1.1 Law of the Wall
- 8.1.2 Mean velocity-mean temperature relations
- 8.1.3 Reynolds Analogy Factor
- 8.1.4 Morkovin's hypothesis
- 8.1.5 Morkovin's strong Reynolds analogy
- 8.1.6 Turbulence structure
- 8.2 Shock wave boundary layer interaction
- 8.3 Summary
- Chapter
- A.1 Introduction
- A.1.1 Scope of survey
- A.1.2 Notation
- A.1.3 Flight envelope
- A.1.4 Blowdown tunnel
- A.1.5 Expansion tunnel
- A.1.6 Gun tunnel
- A.1.7 Hotshot tunnel
- A.1.8 Ludwieg tube
- A.1.9 Reflected shock tunnel
- A.2 Aerospace Research Laboratories
- A.2.1 ARL 20 inch hypersonic wind tunnel
- A.2.2 ARL 30 inch hypersonic wind tunnel
- A.2.3 ARL Mach 6 High Reynolds Number Facility
- A.3 AFRL Mach 6 Ludwieg Tube
- A.4 Applied Physics Laboratory JHU
- A.5 Arnold Engineering Development Center.
- A.5.1 Tunnels B and C
- A.5.2 Tunnel 9
- A.6 Australian National University
- A.7 California Institute of Technology
- A.7.1 Hypersonic wind tunnels
- A.7.2 T5 hypervelocity tunnel
- A.7.3 Hypervelocity expansion tube
- A.8 Calspan University of Buffalo Research Center (CUBRC)
- A.8.1 Calspan 48 inch and 96 inch shock tunnels
- A.8.2 LENS I, II
- A.8.3 LENS XX
- A.9 Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute (TsAGI)
- A.9.1 T-116
- A.9.2 T-117
- A.9.3 T-131B
- A.9.4 UT-1M
- A.10 Cranfield Hypersonic Gun Tunnel
- A.11 Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (German Aerospace Center)
- A.11.1 Hypersonic Wind Tunnel H2K
- A.11.2 High enthalpy shock tunnel HEG
- A.11.3 DLR Ludwieg tube facility
- A.12 HYPULSE
- A.13 Imperial College Gun Tunnel No. 2
- A.14 Instituto Superior Técnico (IST) ESTHER
- A.15 Institut de Saint-Louis shock tunnels
- A.16 Japan HIEST
- A.17 Jet Propulsion Laboratory 21 inch Hypersonic Wind Tunnel
- A.18 Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics
- A.18.1 AT-303
- A.18.2 T-313
- A.18.3 T-326
- A.18.4 IT-302M
- A.18.5 Transit-M
- A.19 Laboratoire de Recherche Balistiqueet Aerodynamiques C2
- A.20 NASA Ames Research Center
- A.20.1 NASA Ames Electric Arc Shock Tube (EAST)
- A.20.2 NASA Ames 3.5 foot Hypersonic Wind Tunnel
- A.20.3 NASA Ames Mach 50 Helium Tunnel
- A.21 NASA Glenn Research Center
- A.22 NASA Langley Research Center
- A.22.1 Langley Aeronautical Laboratory Hypersonic Tunnel
- A.22.2 Mach 6 Quiet Tunnel
- A.22.3 NASA Langley 8 Foot High Temperature Tunnel
- A.22.4 NASA Langley 11 inch Hypersonic Tunnel
- A.22.5 NASA Langley 1 Foot Hypersonic Arc Tunnel
- A.22.6 NASA Langley Hypersonic Flow Apparatus
- A.22.7 NASA Langley Mach 8 Variable Density Hypersonic Tunnel
- A.22.8 NASA Langley 20 inch Mach 6 Tunnel
- A.22.9 NASA Langley 20 inch Mach 8.5 Tunnel.
- A.22.10 NASA Langley 20 inch Hypersonic Arc Heated Tunnel.
- Notes:
- Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
- Description based on print version record.
- Includes bibliographical references.
- ISBN:
- 9780750350044
- 0750350040
- OCLC:
- 1429725496
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.