1 option
Utilitarian Confucianism : Ch'en Liang's Challenge to Chu Hsi / Hoyt Cleveland Tillman.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Tillman, Hoyt Cleveland, author.
- Series:
- Harvard East Asian Monographs ; 101.
- Harvard East Asian Monographs ; 101
- Language:
- Chinese
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Zhu, Xi, 1130-1200.
- Zhu, Xi.
- Chen, Liang, 1143-1194.
- Chen, Liang.
- Neo-Confucianism.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource.
- Distribution:
- Leiden; Boston : BRILL, 1982.
- Other Title:
- Ch'en Liang's Challenge to Chu Hsi
- Place of Publication:
- Boston : Harvard University Asia Center, 1982.
- Language Note:
- Includes Chinese glossary.
- Summary:
- A resource for exploring Ch'en Liang's intellectual development.Ch'en's thought evolved through a tao-hsueh phase to the utilitarian positions for which he is famous. This 'radicalization' represented an evolutionary process. To understand this process, the debate with Chu Hsi, and the significance of both in China's political culture, it is first necessary to take notice of the cultural setting-traditional Confucian polarities and their configurations in the eleventh and twelfth centuries.
- Contents:
- Preliminary Material
- Introduction
- Confucian Polarities and Evolving Configurations in Sung Thought
- The Development of Ch'en Liang's Thought and Personality
- Factors of Personality and Relationship in the Evolution of the Debate
- The Debate on Ethics in Politics
- The Debate on the Tao and Other Values in History
- Politics and the Debate: Illustrated Through the Issue of a War to Regain North China; and Reflected in Polarizations between Schools of Thought
- Conclusion
- Notes
- Bibliography of Sources Cited in the Notes
- Glossary
- Index
- Harvard East Asian Monographs.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references (pages [271]-287) and index.
- Description based on print version record.
- ISBN:
- 1-68417-235-7
- OCLC:
- 706861846
- Publisher Number:
- 10.1163/9781684172351 DOI
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.