1 option
Ethics and Integrity in Research with Older People and Service Users : Moving Beyond the Rhetoric / edited by Roger O'Sullivan.
- Format:
- Book
- Series:
- Advances in research ethics and integrity ; Volume 9.
- Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity Series ; Volume 9
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Research.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (241 pages)
- Edition:
- First edition.
- Place of Publication:
- Leeds, England : Emerald Publishing Limited, [2024]
- Summary:
- Setting out practical insights and guidance, as well as addressing theoretical and philosophical aspects, this volume includes contributions from 'researchers', 'the researched' and 'those in between' on topics including dementia, family carers, and mental health with the common goal of producing high quality 'user' relevant research.
- Contents:
- Cover
- Ethics and Integrity in Research with Older People and Service Users
- ADVANCES IN RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY
- Editorial Advisory Board
- ETHICS AND INTEGRITY IN RESEARCH WITH OLDER PEOPLE AND SERVICE USERS: MOVING BEYOND THE RHETORIC
- Copyright
- Dedication
- Quote Page
- Contents
- Series Preface
- List of Figures and Tables
- List of Abbreviations
- About the Editor
- About the Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- 1. 'VIEWS FROM THE RESEARCHERS'
- 1. Theory and Practice of User-Involved Research
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Defining User Involvement
- Theoretical Underpinnings of User Involvement in Research
- Arnstein's Ladder of Participation
- User Involvement Frameworks
- The Patient-Centred Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Rubric
- The INVOLVE Framework
- The People, Approach and Environment (PAE) Attention Framework
- Applying the PAE Attention Framework to User Involvement in Research
- People Factors: The Successful Researcher
- People Factors: Those Successfully Involved
- Approach Factors: No One Size Fits All
- Environment Factors
- Conclusion
- References
- 2. Navigating Person-Centred Ethics: A Sensory Ethnographic Study Involving Older People Living With Dementia and Family Carers
- Employing a Research Design, Including Theoretical and Methodological Choices, Which Support Person-Centred Ethics
- Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Research Development
- Choosing and Adapting Person-Centred Research Practices and Methods
- Research Relationships
- 3. Incorporating Older Adult Voice Into Meaningful Research - 'It's About Time'
- Background
- The Bureau of Sages
- The Conception of the Bureau
- Processes Used in Development of the Bureau
- Barriers
- Lessons Learned.
- Practical Insights
- The Future of Research Advisory Boards in Long-Term Services and Supports (LTSS)
- 4. Family Conflict in Dementia Caregiving: Maintaining Research Ethics and Integrity
- Dementia and Family Units
- Systematic Review of Family-Focused Interventions in Dementia Care
- Scoping Review - Understanding Family Dynamics and Conflict in the Context of Caring for Someone With Dementia
- Qualitative Interviews With ASNI Staff and Volunteers
- Theme 1: Family Knowledge, Stigma and Denial
- Theme 2: Family Dynamics and Conflict
- Theme 3: Available Support, Barriers to Accessing Support Services and Future Recommendations
- User-Focused Research Ethics and Integrity
- Next Steps - PPI
- Systematic Review Search
- Scoping Review
- 5. Ethical Issues in Research With Vulnerable People: A Case Study
- Research Process and Practicalities
- Methodology
- Profile of Participants
- Logistics
- Focus Group Discussions
- Analysis and Dissemination
- Ethical Considerations
- Ethical Framework and Approval Process
- Recruitment
- Consent
- Capacity Issues
- Avoiding Harm to Participants
- Privacy Risks and Data Confidentiality
- Unexpected Challenges
- Conclusions
- Adult Safeguarding Focus Groups
- Participant Consent Form Easy Read
- 2. 'VIEWS FROM THE RESEARCHED'
- 6. Involving Lay Members of the Public in Research - Reflections and Insights
- Why We Became Involved in PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT (PI)
- Context
- The Need for PI
- Levels of Participation
- The UK Standards for Public Involvement
- Selecting Individuals for PI
- The Mutual Benefits of PI
- Evaluating the Impact of PI
- References.
- 7. Ethics, Integrity and Co-production in Mental Health Research
- Who Are Public Contributors?
- What Do Public Contributors Do?
- Why Reframe Public Contributors as Citizen Ethicists?
- Citizen Ethicists Are Essential
- Are Citizen Ethicists Competent?
- Enable Citizen Ethicists to Flourish
- 3. 'VIEWS FROM THOSE WHO FALL IN BETWEEN'
- 8. Research With Older Adults in American Indian1 Communities - Understanding Knowledge, Power and Practice
- Barriers to Valid Research About Culturally Different Populations
- Western Social Science Research
- Context and Barriers to Research About American Indians
- American Indian History: Ethics, Removal and Erasure
- Ethics
- Removal and Erasure
- Research Gone Wrong
- Medical Practice Research Informed by Eugenics
- Unauthorized Use and Distribution of Biologic Samples Taken From the Havasupai Tribe
- Examples of Success
- Aboriginal Older People Become Peer Educators
- American Indian Community Members Partner in Research to Evaluate Effectiveness of a Training Intervention
- Community-Based, Participatory Research: A Way Forward for American Indian Research: Knowledge and Awareness, Methods and E ...
- 9. Engaged Research as Team Science Reflections From the 'Researcher' and the 'Researched'
- What Are Co-Led and Co-Designed Research?
- What Is Team Science, and How Does It Relate to Engaged Research?
- Participatory Team Science Exemplar
- Discussion
- 10. Trying the Patience of Patients: A Personal Reflection
- Waiting for Treatment
- Ignorance of Patient Needs
- Cultural Differences
- Professional Indifference
- Postscript
- Appendix.
- Further Reading and Resources
- Glossary*
- Index.
- Notes:
- Description based on print version record.
- Other Format:
- Print version: O'Sullivan, Roger Ethics and Integrity in Research with Older People and Service Users
- ISBN:
- 9781804554227
- 1-80455-422-7
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.