My Account Log in

4 options

Judging Insanity, Punishing Difference : A History of Mental Illness in the Criminal Court / Chloé Deambrogio.

De Gruyter Stanford University Press Complete eBook-Package 2023. Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online

Ebscohost Ebooks University Press Collection (North America) Available online

View online

eBook Psychology/Psychiatry Collection Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Deambrogio, Chloé, author.
Series:
Cultural lives of law.
The cultural lives of law
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Insanity (Law)--Texas--History--20th century.
Insanity (Law).
Criminal liability--Texas--History--20th century.
Criminal liability.
Insanity defense--Texas--History--20th century.
Insanity defense.
Forensic psychiatry--Texas--History--20th century.
Forensic psychiatry.
Capital punishment--Texas--History--20th century.
Capital punishment.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (282 pages)
Edition:
First edition.
Place of Publication:
Stanford, California : Stanford University Press, [2023]
Summary:
"In Judging Insanity, Punishing Difference, Chloe Deambrogio explores how developments in the field of forensic psychiatry shaped American courts' assessments of defendants' mental health and criminal responsibility over the course of the 20th century. During this period, new psychiatric notions of the mind and its readability, legal doctrines of insanity and diminished culpability, and cultural stereotypes about race and gender shaped the ways in which legal professionals, mental health experts, and lay witnesses approached mental disability evidence, especially in cases carrying the death penalty. Using Texas as a case-study, Deambrogio examines how these medical, legal, and cultural trends shaped psycho-legal debates in state criminal courts, while shedding light on the ways in which experts and lay actors' interpretations of 'pathological' mental states influenced trial verdicts in capital cases. She shows that despite mounting pressures from advocates of the 'rehabilitative penology', Texas courts maintained a punitive approach towards defendants allegedly affected by severe mental disabilities, while allowing for moralized views about personalities, habits, and lifestyle to influence psycho-legal assessments, in potentially prejudicial ways"-- Provided by publisher.
Contents:
Intro
Title Page
Copyright
Series Page
Dedication
Contents
List of Tables
Acknowledgments
Introduction
Part 1: The Biological Paradigm (1909-1952)
1. Heredity, Environment, and the Doctrine of Civilization
2. Biology, Insanity, and the Criminal Courts
Part 2: The Psychoanalytic Paradigm (1952-1976)
3. Psychoanalysis, the Insanity Defense, and the Family-Centered Ideology
4. Psychoanalysis and the Construction of the Criminal Psychopath
Part 3: The New Scientific Paradigm (1976-2002)
5. The "New" Scientific Psychiatry, Antisocial Personality Disorder, and Future Dangerousness
6. The Abused and Neglected as a "Continuing Threat to Society"
Epilogue: Forensic Psychiatry and Trial Practices in the Twenty-First Century
Appendix
Notes
References
Index
Series List.
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Description based on print version record.
Other Format:
Print version: Deambrogio, Chloé Judging Insanity, Punishing Difference
ISBN:
9781503637368
1503637360
OCLC:
1410915176

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account