2 options
Elections: observations on voting equipment use and replacement : report to congressional requesters.
- Format:
- Book
- Government document
- Author/Creator:
- United States. Government Accountability Office, author, issuing body.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- United States. Help America Vote Act of 2002.
- United States.
- Voting-machines--Testing--Government policy--United States.
- Voting-machines.
- Elections--Equipment and supplies--Standards.
- Elections.
- Voting--United States--States--Evaluation.
- Voting.
- Genre:
- Online resources.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (vii, 155 pages) : illustrations, photographs
- Other Title:
- Observations on voting equipment use and replacement
- Voting equipment use and replacement
- Place of Publication:
- [Washington, D.C.] : United States Government Accountability Office, 2018.
- Summary:
- Much of the voting equipment acquired with federal funds after the enactment of the Help America Vote Act in 2002 may now be reaching the end of its life span, and some states and local election jurisdictions--which number about 10,300 and generally have responsibility for conducting federal elections--have or are considering whether to replace their equipment. This report addresses (1) the types of voting equipment jurisdictions used for the 2016 general election and their perspectives on the equipment; (2) factors considered when deciding whether to replace equipment and replacement approaches in selected jurisdictions; and (3) stakeholder perspectives on how federal voting system guidelines affect replacing and developing equipment. GAO surveyed officials from a nationwide generalizable sample of 800 local jurisdictions (68 percent weighted response rate) and all 50 states and the District of Columbia (46 responded) to obtain information on voting equipment use and replacement. GAO also interviewed officials from (1) five jurisdictions, selected based on population size and type of voting equipment used, among other things, to illustrate equipment replacement approaches; and (2) seven voting system vendors, selected based on prevalence of jurisdictions' use of equipment, type of equipment manufactured, and systems certified, to obtain views on federal voting system guidelines. These interviews are not generalizable, but provide insights into jurisdictions' and vendors' experiences.
- Contents:
- Background.
- Local election jurisdictions primarily used two types of voting equipment, monitored such equipment, and were generally satisfied with equipment performance.
- Local election jurisdictions and states consider multiple factors, and selected jurisdictions have varying approaches when replacing voting equipment.
- Stakeholders have varying view on how the voting system guidelines affect equipment replacement and development, and the EAC is updating the guidelines with stakeholder input.
- Agency and third-party comments.
- Appendices.
- Notes:
- "April 2018."
- "GAO-18-294."
- Includes bibliographical references.
- Online resource; title from PDF cover page (GAO, viewed April 28, 2018).
- OCLC:
- 1032399064
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.