My Account Log in

2 options

The prevalence of the "natural" claim on food product packaging / Fred Kuchler, Megan Sweitzer, and Carolyn Chelius.

Online

Available online

View online

U.S. Government Documents Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Government document
Author/Creator:
Kuchler, Fred, author.
Sweitzer, Megan, author.
Chelius, Carolyn, author.
Contributor:
United States. Department of Agriculture. Economic Research Service, issuing body.
Series:
Economic brief (United States. Department of Agriculture. Economic Research Service) ; no. 35.
Economic brief ; number 35
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Food--Labeling--United States.
Food.
Natural foods--Labeling--United States.
Natural foods.
Food--Labeling.
Natural foods--Labeling.
United States.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (ii, 10 pages).
Place of Publication:
[Washington, D.C.] : Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2023.
Summary:
U.S. food suppliers make claims about their production processes on food packaging that highlight attributes some consumers want while charging a higher price than for unlabeled products. Some labels use such claims as "USDA Organic" and "raised without antibiotics," which require different and more expensive production techniques than conventional agriculture. However, food suppliers can use the label that claims the food is "natural" at a relatively low cost because regulatory agencies treat the claim as meaning nothing artificial was added and the product was minimally processed. Numerous consumer food choice studies concluded that consumers equate the natural label on food with healthier food choices and more costly production practices that signify environmental stewardship. Informed by these previous studies' findings, the authors of this report estimate the frequency with which food suppliers make the natural claim on food packaging labels. Estimates are based on scanner data and comprehensive label data. Across all foods in 2018, 16.3 percent of retail food expenditures and 16.9 percent of all items purchased (unit sales) were for foods labeled natural, whereas 11.0 percent of Universal Product Codes (UPC) in stores were labeled natural on the packaging. Expenditures for food labeled natural were larger than expenditures for foods labeled USDA Organic. Natural labels were found predominately on processed products. For example, 95.6 percent of expenditures for vitamins and meal supplements were for products labeled natural, compared with 0.5 percent of expenditures for potatoes
Notes:
In scope of the U.S. Government Publishing Office Cataloging and Indexing Program (C&I) and Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP).
"May 2023."
Includes bibliographical references (pages 8-9).
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (ERS, viewed June 7, 2023).
OCLC:
1381361620

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account