2 options
Critical infrastructure protection : CISA should improve priority setting, stakeholder involvement, and threat information sharing : report to congressional requesters.
- Format:
- Book
- Government document
- Author/Creator:
- United States. Government Accountability Office, author.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- United States. Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency--Rules and practice--Evaluation.
- United States.
- Emergency management--United States--Evaluation.
- Emergency management.
- Infrastructure (Economics)--Security measures--United States--Planning--Evaluation.
- Infrastructure (Economics).
- Public-private sector cooperation--United States.
- Public-private sector cooperation.
- Emergency management--Evaluation.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (iii, 54 pages) : color illustrations, color maps.
- Other Title:
- Critical infrastructure protection : Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency should improve priority setting, stakeholder involvement, and threat information sharing
- CISA should improve priority setting, stakeholder involvement, and threat information sharing
- Place of Publication:
- Washington, DC : United States Government Accountability Office, 2022.
- Summary:
- The risk environment for critical infrastructure ranges from extreme weather events to physical and cybersecurity attacks. The majority of critical infrastructure is owned and operated by the private sector, making it vital that the federal government work with the private sector, along with state, local, tribal, and territorial partners. CISA is the lead federal agency responsible for overseeing domestic critical infrastructure protection efforts. This report examines (1) the extent to which the National Critical Infrastructure Prioritization Program currently identifies and prioritizes nationally significant critical infrastructure, (2) CISA's development of the National Critical Functions framework, and (3) key services and information that CISA provides to mitigate critical infrastructure risks.
- Contents:
- Background.
- CISA and critical infrastructure stakeholders do not find the NCIPP useful. Limited understanding of national critical functions framework may pose challenges.
- CISA cyber services and threat information sharing lack regional focus.
- Conclusions.
- Recommendations for executive action.
- Agency comments and our evaluation.
- Appendices.
- Notes:
- "March 2022."
- "GAO-22-104279."
- Includes bibliographical references.
- Description based on online resource, PDF version; title from cover (GAO, viewed on May 6, 2022).
- OCLC:
- 1302059855
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.