My Account Log in

2 options

Afghanistan development : agencies could benefit from a shared and more comprehensive database on U.S. efforts : report to Congressional requesters.

Online

Available online

View online

U.S. Government Documents Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Government document
Author/Creator:
United States. Government Accountability Office
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
United States. Agency for International Development--Rules and practice.
United States.
United States. Department of Defense--Rules and practice.
United States. Department of State--Rules and practice.
United States. Agency for International Development.
United States. Department of Defense.
United States. Department of State.
Economic assistance, American--Afghanistan.
Economic assistance, American.
Interagency coordination--United States.
Interagency coordination.
Afghanistan.
Genre:
Rules.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (iii, 50 pages) : color maps
Other Title:
Agencies could benefit from a shared and more comprehensive database on United States efforts
Place of Publication:
[Washington, D.C.] : U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, [2012]
Summary:
Congress has provided almost $20 billion for development efforts in Afghanistan since 2002 through four main programs or accounts administered by USAID, DOD, and State. These efforts are a key component of the U.S. civilian-military strategic framework focused on countering insurgents in Afghanistan. Given the volume and multifaceted nature of U.S. support for Afghan development, it is essential that agencies streamline their efforts to reduce unnecessary overlap and duplication. As such, this report examines (1) the extent to which U.S. agencies' development efforts overlap, (2) the extent to which USAID and DOD's CERP may have conducted duplicative activities, and (3) the mechanisms that U.S. agencies have used to enhance coordination of their development efforts, in Afghanistan.
Contents:
Background
U.S. agencies' development efforts in Afghanistan overlap
Analysis for potential duplication was inconclusive because of limitations and gaps in agency data
U.S. agencies use various methods to coordinate but lack a shared database that includes all development efforts
Conclusions.
Notes:
Title from PDF title screen (viewed Jan. 23, 2013).
"November 2012."
Includes bibliographical references.
Online resource; title from PDF title page (GAO, viewed December 10, 2012).
"GAO-13-34."
OCLC:
820706076

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account