My Account Log in

2 options

An experimental evaluation of tactical symbol-design features / Michael G. Samet, Ralph E. Geiselman and Betty M. Landee.

Connect to full text Available online

View online

U.S. Government Documents Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Government document
Author/Creator:
Samet, Michael G., author.
Geiselman, R. Edward, author.
Landee, Betty M., author.
Contributor:
U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, issuing body.
Perceptronics Incorporated
Series:
Technical report (U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences) ; 498.
Technical report ; 498
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Symbolism in communication.
Military symbols.
Genre:
technical reports.
Technical reports
Technical reports.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (x, 58 pages) : illustrations
Place of Publication:
Alexandria, Virginia : U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, April 1980.
Summary:
Sixteen non-military participants learned each of two symbol sets (conventional, iconic) to a criterion. Each set contained three basic symbols representing unit types of armor, mechanized infantry, and infantry. After learning a symbol set, each participant was shown a series of situation displays, where some displays contained symbols coded with either perimeter-density or vector projection to convey supplementary unit-attribute information (unit strength or firepower reach) needed for typical tactical tasks. For each display, the participant was asked questions corresponding to different behavioral processes (identification, search, comparison, pattern recognition). Overall, the results suggested that iconic symbols may not necessarily be preferable to conventional symbols in certain situations; and, although the portrayal of supplemental unit information can slow some aspects of information processing, certain symbol-design features appear to create less interference than others.
Contents:
Introduction
Method
Results
Discussion
Summary
Appendix.
Notes:
"Perceptronics, Inc."
"PATR-1063-80-4(2)"--Report documentation page.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 35-37).
Electronic reproduction. [Place of publication not identified] : HathiTrust Digital Library, 2012.
Print version record.
Other Format:
Print version: Samet, Michael G. Experimental evaluation of tactical symbol-design features
Microfiche version: Samet, Michael G. Experimental evaluation of tactical symbol-design features
OCLC:
784280285
Access Restriction:
Use copy Restrictions unspecified

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account