My Account Log in

2 options

Weather research and forecasting model wind sensitivity study at Edwards Air Force Base, CA / Leela R. Watson, William H. Bauman III.

Online

Available online

View online

U.S. Government Documents Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Government document
Author/Creator:
Watson, Leela Ramaswamy
Contributor:
Bauman, William H. III
John F. Kennedy Space Center
Series:
NASA contractor report ; NASA CR-214755.
NASA contractor report ; NASA/CR-2008-214755
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Mathematical models.
Meteorology.
Numerical weather forecasting.
Models, Theoretical.
Meteorological Concepts.
mathematical models.
meteorology.
Medical Subjects:
Models, Theoretical.
Meteorological Concepts.
Genre:
technical reports.
Technical reports
Technical reports.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (33 pages) : illustrations, maps.
Place of Publication:
[Kennedy Space Center, Fla.] : National Aeronautics and Space Administration [Kennedy Space Center], [2008]
Summary:
NASA prefers to land the space shuttle at Kennedy Space Center (KSC). When weather conditions violate Flight Rules at KSC, NASA will usually divert the shuttle landing to Edwards Air Force Base (EAFB) in Southern California. But forecasting surface winds at EAFB is a challenge for the Spaceflight Meteorology Group (SMG) forecasters due to the complex terrain that surrounds EAFB. One particular phenomena identified by SMG is that makes it difficult to forecast the EAFB surface winds is called "wind cycling". This occurs when wind speeds and directions oscillate among towers near the EAFB runway leading to a challenging deorbit bum forecast for shuttle landings. The large-scale numerical weather prediction models cannot properly resolve the wind field due to their coarse horizontal resolutions, so a properly tuned high-resolution mesoscale model is needed. The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model meets this requirement. The AMU assessed the different WRF model options to determine which configuration best predicted surface wind speed and direction at EAFB. To do so, the AMU compared the WRF model performance using two hot start initializations with the Advanced Research WRF and Non-hydrostatic Mesoscale Model dynamical cores and compared model performance while varying the physics options.
Contents:
Executive summary
Introduction
Data and methodology
Subjective analysis
Objective analysis
Conclusions.
Notes:
Title from title screen (viewed on May 4, 2011).
"December 2008."
Includes bibliographical references (pages 30-31).
OCLC:
720066347

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account