2 options
System 6 alternatives : an economic analysis / Bruce G. Hansen, Hugh W. Reynolds.
- Format:
- Book
- Government document
- Author/Creator:
- Hansen, Bruce G., author.
- Reynolds, Hugh W., author.
- Series:
- U.S. Forest Service research paper NE ; 551.
- U.S. Forest Service research paper NE ; 551
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Forests and forestry--Economic aspects.
- Forests and forestry.
- Hardwoods--Standards.
- Hardwoods.
- Investment analysis.
- Logging--Technological innovations.
- Logging.
- Corporations--Finance.
- Corporations.
- Business enterprises--Finance.
- Business enterprises.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (14 pages) : illustrations.
- Other Title:
- System six alternatives
- Place of Publication:
- Broomall, PA : United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, [1984]
- Summary:
- S2Three system 6 mill-size alternatives were designed and evaluated to determine their overall economic potential for producing standard-size hardwood blanks. The study focused on developing standard discounted cash flow measures. Internal rates of return ranged from about 15 to 35 percent after taxes. Secondary effort was directed at providing accounting cost summaries to facilitate cost comparison of standard-size blanks with rough-dimension stock. Cost per square foot of blanks ranged from about $0.88 to $1.19, depending on mill size and the amount of new investment required. S3.
- Notes:
- Title from title screen (viewed July 25, 2013).
- Distributed to depository libraries in microfiche.
- Includes bibliographical references (page 11).
- Electronic reproduction. [Place of publication not identified] : HathiTrust Digital Library, 2010.
- Other Format:
- Print version: Hansen, Bruce G. System 6 alternatives
- Microfiche version: Hansen, Bruce G. System 6 alternatives
- OCLC:
- 681905373
- Access Restriction:
- Use copy Restrictions unspecified
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.