Defense infrastructure : DOD needs to determine and use the most economical building materials and methods when acquiring new permanent facilities : report to the Subcommittee on Readiness, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives.

Format:

Book

Government document

Author/Creator:

United States. Government Accountability Office

Contributor:

Lepore, Brian J.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. Readiness Subcommittee

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

United States. Army--Facilities--Design and construction.

United States.

United States. Army--Facilities--Energy conservation--Government policy.

United States. Army.

Building materials--Costs.

Building materials.

Terrorism--United States--Prevention.

Terrorism.

Terrorism--Prevention.

Physical Description:

1 online resource (ii, 52 pages) : illustrations

Other Title:

DOD needs to determine and use the most economical building materials and methods when acquiring new permanent facilities

Place of Publication:

[Washington, D.C.] : U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, [2010]

Summary:

To meet the challenges associated with a threefold increase in the Army's military construction program between fiscal years 2005 and 2009, the Army adopted numerous changes, including the expanded use of wood materials and modular building methods, designed to reduce building costs and timelines for new facilities. With the changes, the Army set goals to reduce building costs by 15 percent and timelines by 30 percent. The Army, Navy, and Air Force have also faced challenges associated with incorporating both antiterrorism construction standards and sustainable design ("green") goals into new facilities. GAO was asked to (1) assess the Army's progress in meeting its goals, (2) evaluate the merits from the Army's expanded use of wood materials and modular building methods, and (3) examine potential conflicts between antiterrorism construction standards and sustainable design goals. GAO reviewed relevant documentation, interviewed cognizant service officials, analyzed selected construction project data, and visited five Army installations to review facilities built with alternative materials and methods. GAO recommends that the Department of Defense (DOD) determine the merits and long-term costs from the use of alternative building materials and methods and subsequently revise its military construction guidance, as deemed appropriate. DOD generally agreed with the recommendations.

Notes:

Title from cover screen (GAO, viewed May 3, 2010).

"April 2010."

Includes bibliographical references.

"GAO-10-436."

OCLC:

610650138