My Account Log in

2 options

Decision process to identify lessons for transition to a distributed (or blended) learning instructional format / Thomas R. Graves and William R. Bickley.

Connect to full text Available online

View online

U.S. Government Documents Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Government document
Author/Creator:
Graves, Thomas R., author.
Bickley, William R., author.
Contributor:
U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, issuing body.
Series:
ARI research note ; 2010-02.
ARI research note ; 2010-02
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
United States. Army--Officials and employees.
United States.
United States. Army.
Blended learning.
Teaching--Aids and devices.
Teaching.
Military education.
Statistics.
Decision making.
Teaching Materials.
Decision Making.
instructional materials.
decision making.
statistics.
Armed Forces--Officials and employees.
Medical Subjects:
Teaching Materials.
Decision Making.
Genre:
technical reports.
Technical reports
Technical reports.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (approximately 175 pages) : illustrations
Place of Publication:
Arlington, Virginia : United States Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, November 2009.
Summary:
The U.S. Army Infantry School, Office of the G-3, asked the Army Research Institute to evaluate the course content of 51 programs of instruction (n=2,065 lessons) for potential transition to a distributed learning instructional format. Using a mixed-method coding and analysis approach, the sample of POIs were categorized, coded, statistically analyzed, and a decision-process was developed to classify lessons into fully transitionable, partially transitionable or not transitionable groups. The thematic structure of course content types and the decision process may be adapted by related Army organizations seeking to evaluate their curricula for lessons that could be transitioned to a distributed learning format. Statistical analyses of the sample are provided as well as detailed appendices concerning the classification of the specific lessons in the sample.
Notes:
"Report date: November 2009"--Report documentation page
"September 2009."
Includes bibliographical references (pages 25-26).
Online resource; title from PDF cover (DTIC website, viewed May 07, 2020).
OCLC:
505427184

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account