My Account Log in

2 options

Hybrid threats : reconceptualizing the evolving character of modern conflict / by Frank G. Hoffman.

Connect to full text Available online

View online

U.S. Government Documents Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Government document
Author/Creator:
Hoffman, Frank G.
Contributor:
National Defense University. Institute for National Strategic Studies
Series:
Strategic forum ; no. 240.
Strategic forum ; no. 240
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Irregular warfare.
Asymmetric warfare.
Strategy.
Military doctrine.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (8 pages) : color illustrations
Other Title:
Reconceptualizing the evolving character of modern conflict
Place of Publication:
[Washington, D.C.] : Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University, [2009]
Summary:
America's ongoing battles in Afghanistan and Iraq have highlighted limitations in our understanding of the complexity of modern warfare. Furthermore, our cultural prism has retarded the institutionalization of capabilities needed to prevail in stabilization and counterinsurgency missions. An ongoing debate about future threats is often framed as a dichotomous choice between counterinsurgency and conventional war. This oversimplifies defense planning and resource allocation decisions. Instead of fundamentally different approaches, we should expect competitors who will employ all forms of war, perhaps simultaneously. Such multimodal threats are often called hybrid threats. Hybrid adversaries employ combinations of capabilities to gain an asymmetric advantage. Thus, the choice is not simply one of preparing for long-term stability operations or high-intensity conflict. We must be able to do both simultaneously against enemies far more ruthless than today's. This essay widens the aperture of the current debate to account for this threat. It compares and contrasts four competing perspectives and evaluates them for readiness and risk implications. This risk assessment argues that the hybrid threat presents the most operational risk in the near- to midterm. Accordingly, it concludes that hybrid threats are a better focal point for considering alternative joint force postures.
Notes:
Title from title screen (viewed on June 22, 2011).
"April 2009."
Includes bibliographical references (page 8).
Other Format:
Print version: Hoffman, Frank G. Hybrid threats
OCLC:
402364219
Access Restriction:
Approved for public release.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account