2 options
Performance comparison of a BIPV roofing tile system in two mounting configurations : preprint / M.T. Muller, J. Rodriguez, and B. Marion.
- Format:
- Book
- Government document
- Author/Creator:
- Muller, Matthew T.
- Series:
- Conference paper (National Renewable Energy Laboratory (U.S.)) ; NREL/CP-520-45948.
- Conference paper ; NREL/CP-520-45948
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Building-integrated photovoltaic systems--Energy conservation--United States.
- Building-integrated photovoltaic systems.
- Roofing, Tile--Energy conservation--United States.
- Roofing, Tile.
- Architecture and energy conservation--United States.
- Architecture and energy conservation.
- United States.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (9 pages) : illustrations
- Other Title:
- Performance comparison of a building integrated photovoltaic roofing tile system in two mounting configurations
- Place of Publication:
- Golden, CO : National Renewable Energy Laboratory, [2009]
- Summary:
- This paper examines the performance of a building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) roofing system commonly available to residential markets. In particular, polycrystalline Si PV roofing tiles were integrated with concrete roofing tiles in two mounting configurations being used by roofing contractors. In the first configuration, the tiles were directly mounted to the roof sheeting, allowing little to no airflow under the PV modules. In the second configuration, furring strips were attached to the roof deck to create a counter-batten system to which the roofing and PV tiles mount. This counter-batten system provides an air gap between the roof deck and the PV/concrete, tiles which allows for convective cooling. A complete data acquisition system was applied to both mounting configurations and they were monitored for a summer period in Golden, Colorado. A performance comparison is presented for the systems while both are gauged against free-standing, rack-mounted polycrystalline Si PV modules. As expected, modules mounted directly to the deck operated at higher temperatures and produced less power than those on a counter-batten system, while both systems operated at higher temperatures than rack-mounted modules.
- Notes:
- Title from PDF title screen (viewed October 30, 2009).
- "To be presented at the 34th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, June 7-12, 2009."
- "June 2009."
- Includes bibliographical references (page 6).
- OCLC:
- 422780758
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.