2 options
Assessment and management of acute pain in adult medical inpatients : a systematic review / prepared for Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research & Development Service ; prepared by Portland Veterans Affairs Healthcare System [and] Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center ; investigators, Mark Helfand, Michele Freeman.
- Format:
- Book
- Government document
- Series:
- Evidence-based synthesis program (Series)
- Evidence-based synthesis program
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Pain--Treatment.
- Pain.
- Hospital patients.
- Pain--Measurement.
- Outcome assessment (Medical care).
- Inpatients.
- Pain Management.
- Pain Measurement.
- Substance-Related Disorders--complications.
- Treatment Outcome.
- Medical Subjects:
- Inpatients.
- Pain Management.
- Pain Measurement.
- Substance-Related Disorders--complications.
- Treatment Outcome.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (vii, 45 pages) : illustrations
- Place of Publication:
- Washington, DC : Dept. of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research & Development Service, [2008]
- Summary:
- BACKGROUND: Poor pain management in surgical settings is known to be associated with slower recovery, greater morbidity, longer lengths of stay, lower patient satisfaction, and higher costs of care, suggesting that optimal pain care in these settings is of utmost importance in promoting acute illness management, recovery, and adaptation. VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guidelines have been developed for the management of acute post-operative pain, although the basis for many of the recommendations was by expert consensus rather than empirical evidence. The prevalence of pain on the inpatient medical ward is lower than that of a surgical service, but is still substantial. In one hospital survey, 43% of medical ward patients experienced pain, and 12% reported unbearable pain. There are currently no pain-relevant performance measures in place that can support efforts to enhance pain care in these settings, and research on pain management in nonsurgical, nonmalignant acute pain is sparse. The Key Questions were: (1) For inpatients who have acute pain, how do differences in timing and frequency of assessment, severity of pain, and follow-up of pain affect choice of treatment, clinical outcomes, and safety? (2) How do the timing and route of administration of pain interventions compare in effectiveness, adverse effects, and safety in these inpatient care settings? (3) For inpatients with impaired self-report due to any of several factors, including delirium or confusion, pre-existing severe dementia, closed head injury, stroke, and psychosis, how do differences in assessment and management of acute pain affect clinical outcomes or safety? (4) For inpatients with dependencies on tobacco, alcohol, stimulant, marijuana, or opioids, how do differences in assessment and management of acute pain affect clinical outcomes or safety? How do the assessment and management of acute pain differ between patients on pre-existing opioid therapy and patients with opiate addiction?
- Notes:
- Title from title screen (VA.gov, viewed March 5, 2009).
- "April 2008."
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 39-45).
- OCLC:
- 312463783
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.