2 options
International climate change programs : lessons learned from the European Union's emissions trading scheme and the Kyoto Protocol's clean development mechanism : report to congressional requesters / United States Government Accountability Office.
Connect to full text Available online
View online- Format:
- Book
- Government document
- Author/Creator:
- United States. Government Accountability Office
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Emissions trading--Evaluation.
- Emissions trading.
- Carbon sequestration--Measurement.
- Carbon sequestration.
- Carbon dioxide sinks--Measurement.
- Carbon dioxide sinks.
- Carbon dioxide mitigation.
- Greenhouse gas mitigation.
- Climatic changes--Risk management.
- Climatic changes.
- Physical Description:
- ii, 64 pages : digital, PDF file
- Other Title:
- Lessons learned from the European Union's emissions trading scheme and the Kyoto Protocol's clean development mechanism
- Place of Publication:
- [Washington, D.C.] : U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, [2008]
- Summary:
- International policies to address climate change have largely relied on market-based programs; for example, under the European Union's Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) phase I (2005 to 2007) carbon dioxide emissions reductions were sought by setting a cap on each member state's allowable emissions and distributing tradable allowances to covered entities, such as power plants. Beginning operation in 2002, the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) has relied on offsets, allowing certain industrialized nations to pay for emission reduction projects in developing countries--where the cost of abatement may be less expensive--in addition to reducing emissions within their borders. Legislative proposals to limit greenhouse gas emissions are under consideration in the United States. In this context, GAO was asked to examine the effects of and lessons learned from (1) the ETS phase I and (2) the CDM. GAO worked with the National Academy of Sciences to identify experts in market-based programs and gathered their opinions through a questionnaire, interviewed stakeholders, and reviewed available information.
- Notes:
- Title from title screen (viewed Dec. 3, 2008).
- "November 2008."
- Paper version available from: U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, 441 G St., NW, Rm. LM, Washington, D.C. 20548.
- Includes bibliographical references.
- "GAO-09-151."
- OCLC:
- 276931078
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.