Symbology sourcebook for military applications / Beverly C. Knapp.

Format:

Book

Government document

Author/Creator:

Knapp, Beverly C., author.

Contributor:

U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, issuing body.

Series:

ARI research note ; 86-74.

Research note ; 86-74

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

United States. Army--Officials and employees.

United States.

United States. Army.

Tactics--Data processing.

Tactics.

Maneuver warfare.

Computer-assisted instruction.

Fire control (Naval gunnery)--Radar equipment.

Fire control (Naval gunnery).

Air defenses.

Computer-Assisted Instruction.

Armed Forces--Officials and employees.

Medical Subjects:

Computer-Assisted Instruction.

Physical Description:

1 online resource (approximately 141 pages) : illustrations.

Place of Publication:

Alexandria, VA : U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Science, April 1986.

Summary:

"Military symbology is a widespread communication system used by the Army to convey battlefield information"--Page iii.

This document provides an up-to-date reference of all available military symbols currently being used. This listing is preceded by a summary of recent ARI research efforts in the area of the design and use of military symbology. The research efforts proceeded in three stages. The first stage required the collection and organization of many currently used military symbols to allow comparisons and identify conflicts. This catalog included the Army Field Manual 21-30 and was the basis for a comprehensive database of military symbols, known as TACSYM. TACSYM and several other sources are listed in this document. The second research stage was a survey of user's symbology needs. It revealed two major issues: (1) symbols did not exist for many concepts, and (2) therefore, users developed their own personalized illustrations for the concepts, resulting in a myriad of symbols representing the same concept. The third research stage was to experimentally investigate how to best develop and portray military symbols. Symbol characteristics such as perceptual discriminability, associative value, and configuration have been found to affect symbol detection. A systematic technique for choosing among alternative symbols was developed and procedures for designing new ones are presently being investigated.

Notes:

"September 1984 - January 1985"--Report documenttion page.

"April 1986."

"Performing organization: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences"--Report documentation page.

"Contracting Officer's Representative, Donald Kristiansen."

Includes bibliographical references.

Description based on online resource; title from PDF cover (DTIC website, viewed April 6, 2022).

OCLC:

227686254

Access Restriction:

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE.