My Account Log in

2 options

Nuclear nonproliferation : DOE needs to reassess its program to assist weapons scientists in Russia and other countries : testimony before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives / statement of Robert A. Robinson.

Connect to full text Available online

View online

U.S. Government Documents Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Government document
Author/Creator:
Robinson, R. A. (Robert A.), 1955-
Contributor:
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
United States. Government Accountability Office
Series:
Testimony ; GAO-08-434 T.
Testimony ; GAO-08-434 T
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
United States. Department of Energy--Rules and practice.
United States.
United States. Department of Energy.
Nuclear nonproliferation.
Nuclear arms control.
Genre:
Rules and practice.
Rules.
Physical Description:
13 pages : digital, PDF file.
Other Title:
DOE needs to reassess its program to assist weapons scientists in Russia and other countries
Place of Publication:
[Washington, D.C.] : U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, [2008]
Summary:
Bakcground -- DOE Has Overstated the IPP Program's Progress and Achievements -- Many Scientists in Russia and Other Countries Who Did Not Claim Direct Experience with WMD Have Received Funds from DOE -- DOE's Process for Assessing IPP Project Participants' WMD Credentials Has Weaknesses -- DOE Has Overstated the Number of Jobs Created By the IPP Program -- DOE Has Not Revised the IPP Program's Performance Metrics -- DOE Has Not Developed an Exit Strategy for the IPP Program but Instead Has Expanded Efforts to New Areas -- Russian Government Officials, Russian and Ukrainian Scientists, and U.S. Industry Representatives Questioned the Continuing Need for the IPP Program -- DOE Has Not Developed Criteria to Phase Out the IPP Program -- DOE Has Expanded Efforts to Iraq and Libya and Is Working to Support GNEP -- The IPP Program's Large Balances of Unspent Program Funds Result from Multiple DOE and Contractor Reviews and Delays in Project Implementation.
Notes:
Title from title screen (viewed on Feb. 20, 2008).
"For release ... January 23, 2008."
Paper version available from: U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, 441 G St., NW, Rm. LM, Washington, D.C. 20548.
Includes bibliographical references.
OCLC:
209778733

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account