2 options
A method for analyzing survivability in the context of a one-on-one engagement / Jeffrey A. Smith.
Connect to full text Available online
View online- Format:
- Book
- Government document
- Author/Creator:
- Smith, Jeffrey A.
- Series:
- ARL-TR (Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.) ; 2992.
- ARL-TR ; 2992
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Combat sustainability (Military science).
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (iv, 30 pages) : color illustrations.
- Place of Publication:
- White Sands Missile Range, NM : Army Research Laboratory, [2003]
- Summary:
- We imagine a one-on-one engagement between two adversarial combat platforms, and we want to know who is victorious and who is not. The simple answer is that the victor lives while the vanquished dies. However, if our desire is meaningful analysis platform survivability, then this answer is insufficient. Our answer should reflect a more practical view of victory and defeat; one that illuminates the fate of each platform if we could repeatedly conduct this same engagement. Given that the current paradigm for platform survivability is layered survivability, we ask if there is a unified framework available with which to analyze the full range of survivability options layered survivability suggests. This paper proposes a framework built upon a mathematical construct called the stochastic duel. To construct our duel, we first consider one platform engaging a passive target and model that process via the techniques of renewal theory. From there, we model the one-on-one engagement as a series system, which allows us to apply the method of competing risks. With competing risk framework, we then derive a metric for the probability of survival. Finally, we extend this formalism to include survivability by relying on the concept of layered survivability.
- Notes:
- Title from PDF title screen (viewed on Aug. 4, 2010).
- :July 2003."
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 20-30).
- OCLC:
- 74252257
- Access Restriction:
- Approved tor public release.
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.