Yucca Mountain : persistent quality assurance problems could delay repository licensing and operation : report to Congressional Requesters / United States General Accounting Office.

Format:

Book

Government document

Author/Creator:

United States. General Accounting Office

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

Radioactive waste sites--Nevada--Yucca Mountain--Management--Evaluation.

Radioactive waste sites.

Quality assurance--Nevada--Yucca Mountain.

Quality assurance.

Nevada--Yucca Mountain.

Physical Description:

1 online resource (ii, 42 pages)

Other Title:

Persistent quality assurance problems could delay repository licensing and operation

Yucca Mountain project

Place of Publication:

[Washington, D.C.] : U.S. General Accounting Office, [2004]

Summary:

The Department of Energy (DOE) must obtain a license from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to construct a nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. In licensing, a quality assurance program helps ensure that the information used to demonstrate the safety of the repository is defensible and well documented. DOE developed a corrective action plan in 2002 to fix recurring problems with the accuracy of such information. This report assesses the status of corrective actions and the adequacy of DOE's plan to measure the effectiveness of actions taken. DOE has reportedly implemented most of the actions in its 2002 corrective action plan, but recent audits and assessments have identified lingering quality problems with data, models, and software and continuing management weaknesses. Audits revealed that some data sets could not be traced back to their sources, model development and validation procedures were not followed, and some processes for software development and validation were inadequate or not followed. DOE believes these problems have not affected the technical basis of the project; however, they could adversely affect the licensing process. Recent assessments identified continuing management weaknesses in the areas of roles and responsibilities, quality assurance policies and procedures, and a work environment that did not foster employee confidence in raising concerns without fear of reprisal. NRC has acknowledged DOE's effectiveness in identifying quality problems, but recently concluded that quality problems could delay the licensing process. DOE cannot assess the effectiveness of its 2002 plan because the performance goals to assess management weaknesses lack objective measurements and time frames for determining success. The goals do not specify the amount of improvement expected, how quickly the improvement should be achieved, or how long the improvement should be sustained before the problems can be considered corrected. DOE recently developed a measurement tool that incorporates and revises some of the goals from the action plan, but most of the revised goals continue to lack the necessary time frames needed to determine whether the actions have corrected the recurring problems. A recently completed DOE review of the 2002 plan found that the corrective actions have been fully implemented. However, the review also noted the effectiveness of the actions could not be evaluated because many of the plan's goals lacked the level of objectivity and testing needed to measure effectiveness.

Notes:

Title from PDF title page (viewed Nov. 9, 2005).

"April 2004."

Includes bibliographical references.

"GAO-04-460."

Other Format:

Yucca Mountain.

Yucca Mountain

OCLC:

62300572