My Account Log in

1 option

The Underestimated Public: How Scholars Overlooked the Principles in Citizens' Policy Opinions Nicholas Carlo Dias

Dissertations & Theses @ University of Pennsylvania Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Thesis/Dissertation
Author/Creator:
Dias, Nicholas Carlo, author.
Contributor:
University of Pennsylvania. Political Science., degree granting institution.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Political science.
Communication.
American studies.
Public policy.
0615.
0459.
0323.
0630.
Local Subjects:
Political science.
Communication.
American studies.
Public policy.
0615.
0459.
0323.
0630.
Physical Description:
1 electronic resource (194 pages)
Contained In:
Dissertations Abstracts International 86-12A
Place of Publication:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 2025
Language Note:
English
Summary:
Can citizens' opinions meaningfully guide government policy? Many political scientists fear the answer is numbers While citizens voice opinions about public policies, these "opinions" often seem to be inconsistent with their underlying values and interests. These opinions change with minor differences in question wording or context. Moreover, the vast majority of citizens appear to know very little about the public policies they purport to support or oppose. Yet, determining whether citizens' policy opinions are "principled"-that is, consistent with their values and interests-is challenging, and existing approaches rely on questionable assumptions. This dissertation challenges the consensus that citizens' policy opinions are unprincipled. Using high-quality panel surveys, I show that opinion stability is a weak signal of how principled a policy opinion is. In a cross-sectional survey with a representative sample of American adults, I show that citizens associate values and policy opinions in sensible ways, regardless of their level of education and political interest. Finally, with a pre-registered experiment, I show that citizens can use policy information to successfully align their policy opinions with their values. The broad conclusion of this dissertation is that public opinion is more principled than existing research suggests. As such, we should be less concerned about whether citizens' policy opinions can meaningfully guide government policy
Notes:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-12, Section: A.
Advisors: Levendusky, Matthew S.; Lelkes, Yphtach Committee members: Delli Carpini, Michael X.; Margolis, Michele
Ph.D. University of Pennsylvania 2025
Local Notes:
School code: 0175
ISBN:
9798280757196
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account