1 option
What Works to Reduce Inequalities in Higher Education? : A Systematic Review of the (Quasi-)Experimental Literature on Outreach and Financial Aid / Herbaut, Estelle.
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository (formerly "World Bank E-Library Publications") Available online
View online- Format:
- Book
- Government document
- Author/Creator:
- Herbaut, Estelle.
- Series:
- Policy research working papers.
- World Bank e-Library.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Education.
- Finance and Financial Sector Development.
- Financial Aid.
- Higher Education.
- Poverty Reduction.
- Quasi Experimental Methods.
- Social Inequalities.
- Tertiary Education.
- Local Subjects:
- Education.
- Finance and Financial Sector Development.
- Financial Aid.
- Higher Education.
- Poverty Reduction.
- Quasi Experimental Methods.
- Social Inequalities.
- Tertiary Education.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (83 pages)
- Other Title:
- What Works to Reduce Inequalities in Higher Education? A Systematic Review of the
- What Works to Reduce Inequalities in Higher Education?
- Place of Publication:
- Washington, D.C. : The World Bank, 2019.
- System Details:
- data file
- Summary:
- Policy makers are increasingly searching for ways to allow more disadvantaged students to access and complete higher education. The quickly growing (quasi-)experimental literature on policy interventions in higher education provide the opportunity to identify the causal effects of these interventions on disadvantaged students and discuss inequality mechanisms at the last stage of the educational system. The paper reviews 75 studies and rigorously compares more than 200 causal effects of outreach and financial aid interventions on the access and completion rates of disadvantaged students in higher education. The paper finds that outreach policies are broadly effective in increasing access for disadvantaged students when these policies include active counseling or simplify the university application process, but not when they only provide general information on higher education. For financial aid, the paper finds that need-based grants do not systematically increase enrollment rates but only lead to improvements when they provide enough money to cover unmet need and/or include an early commitment during high school. Still, need-based grants quite consistently appear to improve the completion rates of disadvantaged students. In contrast, the evidence indicates that merit-based grants only rarely improve the outcomes of disadvantaged students. Finally, interventions combining outreach and financial aid have brought promising results, although more research on these mixed interventions is needed.
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.