1 option
The Distributive Impact of Taxes and Expenditures in Colombia / Jairo, Nunez.
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository (formerly "World Bank E-Library Publications") Available online
View online- Format:
- Book
- Government document
- Author/Creator:
- Jairo, Nunez.
- Series:
- Policy research working papers.
- World Bank e-Library.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Distributional Impact.
- Fiscal Incidence.
- Fiscal Policy.
- Inequality.
- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth.
- Poverty.
- Poverty Reduction.
- Public Expenditure.
- Public Sector Development.
- Social Spending.
- Taxation.
- Taxation and Subsidies.
- Local Subjects:
- Distributional Impact.
- Fiscal Incidence.
- Fiscal Policy.
- Inequality.
- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth.
- Poverty.
- Poverty Reduction.
- Public Expenditure.
- Public Sector Development.
- Social Spending.
- Taxation.
- Taxation and Subsidies.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (45 pages)
- Place of Publication:
- Washington, D.C. : The World Bank, 2020.
- System Details:
- data file
- Summary:
- Colombia has reduced extreme poverty in the past 16 years by almost half, moderate poverty by 22 percentage points, and made more than four million Colombians jump the threshold of multidimensional poverty. However, it remains one of the most unequal countries in the region, after Brazil and Panama. Fiscal policy is one of the instruments that allow governments to speed up the decline in inequality levels and reduce poverty. This study presents an exhaustive and comprehensive analysis of the distributional impacts of taxes and expenditures in Colombia in 2017. It makes a methodological comparison with the Commitment to Equity, which was previously implemented, and includes multiple improvements in the methodology. The results suggest that the combined effect of taxes and social spending in Colombia contributes to poverty reduction between 0.3 and 2.6 percentage points for US .5 and US .2 per day per person respectively, while inequality is reduced by almost one Gini point. Taxes and direct transfers, as well as indirect transfers, are progressive and pro-poor, while indirect taxes are regressive and contribute to an increase in inequality. Finally, transfers in-kind for education and health services are progressive and contribute to the reduction of inequality.
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.