1 option
Regionalism in standards : good or bad for trade? / Maggie Xiaoyang Chen and Aaditya Mattoo.
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository (formerly "World Bank E-Library Publications") Available online
View online- Format:
- Book
- Government document
- Author/Creator:
- Chen, Maggie Xiaoyang.
- Series:
- Policy research working papers ; 3458.
- World Bank e-Library.
- Policy research working paper ; 3458
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Commercial treaties.
- Regionalism.
- Other Title:
- Policy research working paper vol. 3458
- Place of Publication:
- [Washington, D.C. : World Bank, 2004]
- System Details:
- data file
- Summary:
- "Regional agreements on standards have been largely ignored by economists and unconditionally blessed by multilateral trade rules. Chen and Mattoo find, theoretically and empirically, that such agreements increase trade between participating countries but not necessarily with the rest of the world. Adopting a common standard in a Region--that is, harmonization--boosts exports of excluded industrial countries to the region. But it reduces exports of excluded developing countries, possibly because developing country firms are hurt more by an increase in the stringency of standards and benefit less from economies of scale in integrated markets. Mutual recognition agreements are more uniformly trade promoting unless they contain restrictive rules of origin, in which case intra-regional trade increases at the expense of trade with other, especially developing, countries. The authors propose a modification of international trade rules to strike a better balance between the interests of integrating and excluded countries. This paper--a product of the Trade Team, Development Research Group--is part of a larger effort in the group to understand the implications for trade of agreements on standards"--World Bank web site.
- Notes:
- Title from PDF file as viewed on 11/19/2004.
- Includes bibliographical references.
- Publisher Number:
- 10.1596/1813-9450-3458
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.