1 option
Implications of a Lowered Damage Trajectory for Mitigation in a Continuous-Time Stochastic Model / Jon Strand
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository (formerly "World Bank E-Library Publications") Available online
View online- Format:
- Book
- Government document
- Author/Creator:
- Strand, Jon
- Series:
- Policy research working papers.
- World Bank e-Library.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Adaptation.
- Adaptation to Climate Change.
- Climate Change Economics.
- Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases.
- Climate Change Policy and Regulation.
- Climate Damages.
- Energy.
- Environment.
- Mitigation.
- Option Values.
- Science of Climate Change.
- Uncertainty.
- Local Subjects:
- Adaptation.
- Adaptation to Climate Change.
- Climate Change Economics.
- Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases.
- Climate Change Policy and Regulation.
- Climate Damages.
- Energy.
- Environment.
- Mitigation.
- Option Values.
- Science of Climate Change.
- Uncertainty.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (19 pages)
- Place of Publication:
- Washington, D.C., The World Bank, 2011
- System Details:
- data file
- Summary:
- This paper provides counterexamples to the idea that mitigation of greenhouse gases causing climate change, and adaptation to climate change, are always and everywhere substitutes. The author considers optimal policy for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions when climate damages follow a geometric Brownian motion process with positive drift, and the trajectory for damages can be down-shifted by adaptive activities, focusing on two main cases: 1) damages are reduced proportionately by adaptation for any given climate impact ("reactive adaptation"); and 2) the growth path for climate damages is down-shifted ("anticipatory adaptation"). In this model mitigation is a lumpy one-off decision. Policy to reduce damages for given emissions is continuous in case 1, but may be lumpy in case 2, and reduces both expectation and variance of damages. Lower expected damages promote mitigation, and reduced variance discourages it (as the option value of waiting is reduced). In case 1, the last effect may dominate. Mitigation then increases when damages are dampened: mitigation and adaptation are complements. In case 2, mitigation and adaptation are always substitutes.
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.