My Account Log in

1 option

Democracy, credibility, and clientelism / Philip Keefer and Razvan Vlaicu.

World Bank Open Knowledge Repository (formerly "World Bank E-Library Publications") Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Government document
Author/Creator:
Keefer, Philip.
Contributor:
World Bank.
Vlaicu, Razvan.
Series:
Policy research working papers ; 3472.
World Bank e-Library.
Policy research working paper ; 3472
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Democracy.
Patron and client.
Policy sciences.
Truthfulness and falsehood.
Other Title:
Policy research working paper vol. 3472
Place of Publication:
[Washington, D.C. : World Bank, 2005]
System Details:
data file
Summary:
"Keefer and Vlaicu demonstrate that sharply different policy choices across democracies can be explained as a consequence of differences in the ability of political competitors to make credible pre-electoral commitments to voters. Politicians can overcome their credibility deficit in two ways. First, they can build reputations. This requires that they fulfill preconditions that in practice are costly--informing voters of their promises, tracking those promises, and ensuring that voters turn out on election day. Alternatively, they can rely on intermediaries--patrons--who are already able to make credible commitments to their clients. Endogenizing credibility in this way, the authors find that targeted transfers and corruption are higher and public good provision lower than in democracies in which political competitors can make credible pre-electoral promises. They also argue that in the absence of political credibility, political reliance on patrons enhances welfare in the short run, in contrast to the traditional view that clientelism in politics is a source of significant policy distortion. However, in the long run reliance on patrons may undermine the emergence of credible political parties. The model helps to explain several puzzles. For example, public investment and corruption are higher in young democracies than old; and democratizing reforms succeeded remarkably in Victorian England, in contrast to the more difficult experiences of many democratizing countries, such as the Dominican Republic. This paper--a product of the Growth and Investment Team, Development Research Group--is part of a larger effort in the group to investigate the political economy of development"--World Bank web site.
Notes:
Title from PDF file as viewed on 1/3/2005.
Includes bibliographical references.
Publisher Number:
10.1596/1813-9450-3472

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account