My Account Log in

1 option

A practical comparison of the bivariate probit and linear IV estimators / Richard C. Chiburis

World Bank Open Knowledge Repository (formerly "World Bank E-Library Publications") Available online

World Bank Open Knowledge Repository (formerly "World Bank E-Library Publications")
Format:
Book
Government document
Author/Creator:
Chiburis, Richard C.
Contributor:
Chiburis, Richard C.
Das, Jishnu
Lokshin, Michael
Series:
Policy research working papers.
World Bank e-Library.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Econometrics.
Educational Technology and Distance Education.
Growth Rates.
International Economics & Trade.
Market Integration.
Output.
Regulatory Environment.
Science Education.
Scientific Research & Science Parks.
Statistical & Mathematical Sciences.
Local Subjects:
Econometrics.
Educational Technology and Distance Education.
Growth Rates.
International Economics & Trade.
Market Integration.
Output.
Regulatory Environment.
Science Education.
Scientific Research & Science Parks.
Statistical & Mathematical Sciences.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (44 pages)
Place of Publication:
Washington, D.C., The World Bank, 2011
System Details:
data file
Summary:
This paper presents asymptotic theory and Monte-Carlo simulations comparing maximum-likelihood bivariate probit and linear instrumental variables estimators of treatment effects in models with a binary endogenous treatment and binary outcome. The three main contributions of the paper are (a) clarifying the relationship between the Average Treatment Effect obtained in the bivariate probit model and the Local Average Treatment Effect estimated through linear IV; (b) comparing the mean-square error and the actual size and power of tests based on these estimators across a wide range of parameter values relative to the existing literature; and (c) assessing the performance of misspecification tests for bivariate probit models. The authors recommend two changes to common practices: bootstrapped confidence intervals for both estimators, and a score test to check goodness of fit for the bivariate probit model.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

We want your feedback!

Thanks for using the Penn Libraries new search tool. We encourage you to submit feedback as we continue to improve the site.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account