1 option
Albert of Saxony's Twenty-Five Disputed Questions on Logic : A Critical Edition of His Quaestiones Circa Logicam.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Fitzgerald, Michael J., author.
- Series:
- Studien und Texte Zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters
- Language:
- Latin
- Subjects (All):
- Logic--Early works to 1800.
- Logic.
- Albertus, de Saxonia, -1390. Quaestiones circa logicam.
- Albertus.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (448 pages)
- Edition:
- 1st ed.
- Place of Publication:
- Boston : BRILL, 2002.
- Summary:
- This critical edition of Albert of Saxony's 25 Questions on Logic is a set of Quaestiones Disputatae which treats issues of the Parva Logicalia such as: the nature of logic; the imposition, distribution, signification, and supposition of designating and non-designating terms; the truth and falsity, conversion, contradictoriness, and kinds of propositions; and problems involving the scope of negations. The inclusion of several appendices of previously untranscribed and unedited material by Albert of Saxony, Ralph Strode, and John Buridan; together with Notes and an Index of concepts and an Albert Concordance keyed to paragraph numbers, make the book a most useful source of primary material for students and scholars.
- Contents:
- Acknowledgements
- INTRODUCTION
- Albert, Buridan, and Maulfelt
- The Chronological and Relative Order of Albert's Major Logical Works
- Descriptions of the Known Manuscripts of the Quaestiones Circa Logicam
- Authenticity of the Quaestiones Circa Logicam
- Editorial Principles and Stemma Codicum
- Sigla Manuscriptorum et Abbreviationes
- Tabula Istarum Quaestionum
- QUAESTIONES CIRCA LOGICAM ALBERTI DE SAXONIA
- Prima Quaestio: Utrum logica sit scientia speculativa vel practica
- Secunda Quaestio: Utrum omnis terminus sit imponibilis ad significandum
- Tertia Quaestio: Utrum omnis terminus sit significativus
- Quarta Quaestio: Utrum termini ad placitum instituti significent res vel conceptus animae
- Quinta Quaestio: Utrum omne nomen significet aliquid quod non est illudmet nomen, nec sibi simile in mente, vel in voce, vel in scripto
- Sexta Quaestio: Utrum nomen infinitum sit de consideratione logici
- Septima Quaestio: Utrum obliquus posset esse subiectum vel praedicatum propositionis
- Octava Quaestio: Utrum verbum possit absolvi a tempore sic quod non significet cum tempore
- Nona Quaestio: Utrum verbum semper sit nota eorum quae de altero dicuntur vel praedicantur
- Decima Quaestio: Utrum quodlibet universale sit ens
- Undecima Quaestio: Utrum substantia et quantitas sunt praedicamenta distincta
- Duodecima Quaestio: Utrum terminus pro omni illo supponat quod significat
- Triadecima Quaestio: Utrum descriptio suppositionis sit bona, qua dicitur 'Suppositio est acceptio seu usus termini categorematici qua accipitur pro aliquo in propositione'
- Quartadecima Quaestio: Utrum definitio suppositionis simplicis sit bona, scilicet 'Suppositio simplex est acceptio termini vocalis vel scripti qua accipitur pro intentione animae cui imponitur ad significandum'
- Quintadecima Quaestio: Utrum descriptio suppositionis materialis valeat
- Sextadecima Quaestio: Utrum signum universale affirmativum confundat terminum immediate sequentem confuse distributive, et terminum mediate sequentem confuse tantum
- Septimadecima Quaestio: Utrum negatio confundat confuse distributive terminum communem sequentem se
- Duodevicesima Quaestio: Utrum relativum supponat eodem modo sicut suum antecedens
- Undevigesima Quaestio: Utrum in propositione de praesenti subiectum possit ampliari ad supponendum pro eo quod fuit, vel erit, vel potest esse
- Vigesima Quaestio: Utrum omnis propositio sit vera vel falsa
- Vicesima Prima Quaestio: Utrum omnis propositio sit affirmativa vel negativa
- Vicesima Secunda Quaestio: Utrum omnis propositio sit universalis vel particularis, vel indefinita, vel singularis
- Vicesima Tertia Quaestio: Utrum omnis propositio in qua subicitur terminus communis termino numerali determinatus sit universalis, verbi gratia: Mille homines currunt
- Vicesima Quarta Quaestio: Utrum propositiones contradictoriae possint esse simul verae vel simul falsae etc
- Vicesima Quinta Quaestio: Utrum conversio sit possibilis
- APPENDICES
- Appendix I: Radulphus Strode, De Suppositione Materiali
- Appendix II: Albertus de Saxonia, Quaestiones subtilissime super libros Posteriorum analyticorum Aristotelis, Venice, 1497, Liber Primus
- Prima Quaestio: Utrum demonstratione possibile sit habere aliquis distinctas notitias specie, ut videlicet, scientiam et opinionem; notitiam complexam et incomplexam; notitiam intuitivam et abstactivam
- Tertia Quaestio: Utrum possibile sit nos aliquid scire
- Decima Quaestio: Utrum non-ens possit sciri vel intelligi
- Undecima Quaestio: Utrum ad veritatem cuiuslibet propositionis requiratur et sufficiat sic esse sicut per ipsam significatur
- Appendix III: Albertus de Saxonia, Sophismata, Sophisma viii: Paris 1502, Cuiuslibet hominis asinus currit
- Appendix IV: Quinta Quaestio De Interpretatione Iohanni Buridani, Tortosa Cathedral Latin MS. 108
- Appendix V: Albertus de Saxonia, Quaestiones super logicam Porphyrii, Prima Quaestio, Quaeritur utrum logica est speculativa vel practica, Tort. Cath. Lat. MS. 108
- Appendix VI: Quaestiones Alberti de Saxonia super libros Posteriorum Analyticorum Aristotelis, Tort. Cath. Lat. MS. 108
- /fl61ro/: Quaeritur consequenter utrum omnis doctrina et disciplina intellectiva fiat ex praeexistenti cognitione
- /fl65ro/: Quaeritur utrum possibile sit nos aliquid scire
- /fl70rb/ Quaeritur utrum in demonstratio: propter quid, esse ita in re sicut significatur per praemissas est causa essendi ita in re sicut significatur per conclusionem
- Concordantia Alberti
- Index Conceptuum
- Bibliography.
- Notes:
- Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
- Includes bibliographical references (pages [431]-433).
- Other Format:
- Print version: Fitzgerald Albert of Saxony's Twenty-Five Disputed Questions on Logic
- ISBN:
- 9789004453487
- OCLC:
- 1334890333
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.