1 option
Cognitive aging and the federal circuit courts : how senescence influences the law and judges / Ryan C. Black, Ryan J. Owens, Patrick C. Wohlfarth.
- Format:
- Book
- Series:
- Oxford scholarship online.
- Oxford scholarship online
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- United States. Court of Appeals (Federal Circuit).
- United States.
- Judges--United States--Psychology.
- Judges.
- Judicial process--United States.
- Judicial process.
- Cognition--Age factors.
- Cognition.
- Aging--Physiological aspects.
- Aging.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (265 pages)
- Edition:
- First edition.
- Place of Publication:
- New York, NY : Oxford University Press, [2024]
- Summary:
- In 'Cognitive Aging and the Federal Circuit Courts', a distinguished team of authors investigates how cognitive aging influences federal circuit court judges. The first-of-their-kind results show that as judges age, they require more time to craft their opinions; they rely more on cognitive shortcuts; their opinions become less complex; they increasingly rely on others to help them write opinions; and their legal influence on panels wanes just as their susceptibility to persuasion increases. These results are sure to transform broad debates about institutional reform.
- Contents:
- Cover
- Cognitive Aging and the Federal Circuit Courts: How Senescence Influences the Law and Judges
- Copyright
- Dedication
- Acknowledgments
- Contents
- 1 Introduction
- 1.1 What Is Cognitive Aging?
- 1.2 Plan for the Book
- 2 The Neuroscience behind Cognitive Aging
- 2.1 Cognition and Cognitive Domains
- 2.2 The Effects of Aging on Cognition
- 2.3 The Causes of Cognitive Decline
- 2.4 Conclusion
- 3 How Cognitive Aging Applies to Judges
- 3.1 How Circuit Courts and Circuit Court Judges Operate
- 3.2 Cognitive Aging and Delays
- 3.3 Cognitive Aging and Heuristics
- 3.4 Cognitive Aging, Law Clerks, and Briefs
- 3.5 Cognitive Aging and Decreased Legal Influence
- 3.6 Conclusion
- 4 Opinion Crafting and Cognitive Aging
- 4.1 Opinion Writing, Timing, and Shortcuts
- 4.2 Data and Measures
- 4.3 Delays and Opinion Writing
- 4.4 The Decision to Bargain
- 4.5 Rejecting Colleagues
- 4.6 Conclusion
- 4.7 Appendix
- 4.7.1 Time to Initial Circulation Sensitivity Analysis
- 4.7.2 Responsive Accommodation and Total Opinion-Writing Time
- 5 Opinion Style: Co-authored with Alexander M. Tahk¹
- 5.1 Opinion-Writing Process
- 5.2 Cognitive Aging and Opinion Writing
- 5.3 Data and Measures
- 5.3.1 Dependent Variables
- 5.3.2 Independent Variables
- 5.4 Methods and Results
- 5.5 Conclusion
- 5.6 Appendix
- 5.6.1 Measuring Reverses Lower Court
- 5.6.2 Differences between Bivariate and Multivariate Results
- 5.6.3 Measuring Judicial Ideology: Judicial CommonSpace Robustness
- 5.6.4 Interquartile Range Robustness
- 6 Cognitive Aging, Law Clerks, and Party Briefs
- 6.1 Opinion Writing, Law Clerks, and Party Briefs
- 6.2 Law Clerks: Data and Measures
- 6.3 Law Clerks: Methods and Results
- 6.4 Briefs: Data and Measures
- 6.5 Briefs: Methods and Results
- 6.6 Conclusion
- 6.7 Appendix
- 6.7.1 Function Words.
- 6.7.2 Function Word Variability Formula
- 6.7.3 Statistical Significance and Variability
- 6.7.4 Senior Status and Variability
- 6.7.5 Age Window Length Selection
- 6.7.6 Alternative Presentation of Decade Window Results
- 6.7.7 CopyFind Parameter Values
- 6.7.8 Who Dunnit? Clerks as Opinion Drafters and Plagiarizers
- 7 Aging, Opinion Quality, and the Diffusion of Precedent
- 7.1 The Broader Importance of Opinion Quality
- 7.2 Data and Measures
- 7.3 Methods and Results
- 7.3.1 Citations
- 7.3.2 Positive, Neutral, and Negative Citations
- 7.4 Conclusion
- 7.5 Appendix
- 7.5.1 Pre-Processing by Matching on Binding Precedent
- 7.5.2 Ideological Distance, Precedent Author Age, and Binding Precedent
- 7.5.3 Interactive Model Results
- 8 Cognitive Aging and Following Supreme Court Precedent
- 8.1 Lower Court Treatment of Upper Court Precedent
- 8.2 Data and Measures
- 8.3 Methods and Results
- 8.4 Conclusion
- 9 Cognitive Aging and Panel Composition
- 9.1 The Effects of Panel Composition
- 9.2 Cognitive Aging and Panel Composition
- 9.3 Case-Level Data and Measures
- 9.4 Case-Level Methods and Results
- 9.5 Individual-Level Data and Measures
- 9.6 Individual-Level Methods and Results
- 9.7 Conclusion
- 9.8 Appendix
- 9.8.1 Predicted Probabilities
- 10 Public Attitudes toward Aged Judges
- 10.1 The Public and an Aging Judiciary
- 10.2 Empirical Expectations and Survey Experiment
- 10.3 Methods and Results
- 10.3.1 Judge Age Results
- 10.3.2 Photographic Accentuation Results
- 10.3.3 Policy Agreement Results
- 10.4 Conclusion
- 10.5 Appendix
- 10.5.1 Experimental Materials
- 10.5.2 Model Parameter Estimates
- 10.5.3 Judge Age Manipulation Checks
- 10.5.4 Control Variable Results
- 11 Public Support for Judicial Reforms
- 11.1 The Survey Experiment
- 11.2 Methods and Results.
- 11.2.1 Partisan Cues and Initial Support for Reform
- 11.2.2 Strength of Support
- 11.2.3 Comparing Arguments For and Against Reform
- 11.2.4 Malleability of Reform Attitudes
- 11.3 Conclusion
- 11.4 Appendix
- 12 Conclusion
- 12.1 The Purposes of Judicial Independence and Lifetime Tenure
- 12.2 Previous Reforms to Address Aging Judges
- 12.3 Possible Future Reforms
- Bibliography
- Index.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references and index.
- Description based on online resource and publisher information; title from PDF title page (viewed on August 26, 2024).
- ISBN:
- 9780197747056
- 0197747051
- 9780197747032
- 0197747035
- 9780197747049
- 0197747043
- OCLC:
- 1437889757
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.