My Account Log in

2 options

Ethics, conflict and medical treatment for children : from disagreement to dissensus / Dominic Wilkinson, Julian Savulescu ; foreword by Peter Singer, Neena Modi.

DOAB Directory of Open Access Books Available online

View online

OAPEN Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Wilkinson, Dominic, author.
Savulescu, Julian, author.
Contributor:
Singer, Peter, writer of foreword.
Modi, Neena, writer of foreword.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Pediatrics--Moral and ethical aspects.
Pediatrics.
Pediatrics--Moral and ethical aspects--Case studies.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (180 pages)
Other Title:
Ethics, conflict and medical treatment for children
Place of Publication:
London : Elsevier, 2018.
Summary:
What should happen when doctors and parents disagree about what would be best for a child? When should courts become involved? Should life support be stopped against parents' wishes? The case of Charlie Gard, reached global attention in 2017. It led to widespread debate about the ethics of disagreements between doctors and parents, about the place of the law in such disputes, and about the variation in approach between different parts of the world. In this book, medical ethicists Dominic Wilkinson and Julian Savulescu critically examine the ethical questions at the heart of disputes about medical treatment for children. They use the Gard case as a springboard to a wider discussion about the rights of parents, the harms of treatment, and the vital issue of limited resources. They discuss other prominent UK and international cases of disagreement and conflict. From opposite sides of the debate Wilkinson and Savulescu provocatively outline the strongest arguments in favour of and against treatment. They analyse some of the distinctive and challenging features of treatment disputes in the 21st century and argue that disagreement about controversial ethical questions is both inevitable and desirable. They outline a series of lessons from the Gard case and propose a radical new "dissensus" framework for future cases of disagreement.
Contents:
I: Disagreement
The charlie gard case
II: Agreement
Futility
Best interests
Resources
Research
Parents
III: Agreeing to disagree
Dissensus and value pluralism
Embracing disagreement
Learning from charlie gard.
Notes:
Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account